Suppr超能文献

禁食对水合氯醛镇静效果的影响。

The effect of fasting practice on sedation with chloral hydrate.

作者信息

Keidan Ilan, Gozal David, Minuskin Tal, Weinberg Margalit, Barkaly Haviva, Augarten Arie

机构信息

Pediatric Anesthesia Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel 52621.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Dec;20(12):805-7. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000148027.53598.b8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Infants undergo various painless imaging procedures frequently. Mild sedation is required in such cases to reduce anxiety as well as to ensure optimal performance of the procedure. The most frequently used sedative as a single drug is chloral hydrate. The issue of preprocedural fasting is a subject of contention. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)/American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) fasting practice guidelines on the efficacy and success of the sedation with chloral hydrate.

METHODS

The sedation records of 200 infants from 2 hospitals who underwent auditory brainstem response for evaluation of hearing loss were evaluated retrospectively. In the first hospital (group A), strict nulla per os (NPO) guidelines were followed in accordance with the guidelines published by the AAP/ASA, whereas in the second hospital (group B), no fasting period was required. All children were premedicated with chloral hydrate. We evaluated the sedation failure rate, total dose of chloral hydrate needed, adverse effects, overall sleep time, and time to discharge.

RESULTS

The average fasting period as expected was significantly longer in group A patients than in group B patients (5.7 +/- 1.7 vs. 2 +/- 0.2 hours; P < 0.001). Group A patients demonstrated a significantly higher failure rate to achieve sedation with the first dose of chloral hydrate compared with group B patients (21% vs.11%; P = 0.03), hence needing higher doses (83 +/- 31 vs. 61 +/- 21 mg/kg; P < 0.01), and were sedated for longer periods (103 +/- 42 vs. 73 +/- 48 minutes; P < 0.001) and discharged later. No difference was found in the adverse effect rate.

CONCLUSION

Fasting was associated with an increased failure rate of the initial sedation. As a consequence, an increased total dose of chloral hydrate was required inducing a prolonged sedation time. Presumably, this is a result of the fact that a hungry child is irritable and therefore more difficult to sedate.

摘要

目的

婴儿经常接受各种无痛成像检查。在这种情况下,需要轻度镇静以减轻焦虑并确保检查的最佳效果。最常用的单一镇静药物是水合氯醛。术前禁食问题存在争议。本研究的目的是评估美国儿科学会(AAP)/美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)禁食实践指南对水合氯醛镇静效果和成功率的影响。

方法

回顾性评估来自2家医院的200例接受听性脑干反应以评估听力损失的婴儿的镇静记录。在第一家医院(A组),按照AAP/ASA发布的指南遵循严格的禁食指南,而在第二家医院(B组),则不需要禁食期。所有儿童均预先使用水合氯醛。我们评估了镇静失败率、所需水合氯醛的总剂量、不良反应、总体睡眠时间和出院时间。

结果

正如预期的那样,A组患者的平均禁食期明显长于B组患者(5.7±1.7小时对2±0.2小时;P<0.001)。与B组患者相比,A组患者首次使用水合氯醛镇静失败率明显更高(21%对11%;P=0.03),因此需要更高的剂量(83±31mg/kg对61±21mg/kg;P<0.01),并且镇静时间更长(103±42分钟对73±48分钟;P<0.001),出院时间更晚。不良反应发生率没有差异。

结论

禁食与初始镇静失败率增加有关。因此,需要增加水合氯醛的总剂量,从而导致镇静时间延长。据推测,这是因为饥饿的儿童烦躁不安,因此更难镇静。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验