Suppr超能文献

多动症儿童的持续时间判断表明,他们在时间信息的利用上存在缺陷,而非在时间感知上存在普遍损伤。

Duration judgments in children with ADHD suggest deficient utilization of temporal information rather than general impairment in timing.

作者信息

Radonovich Krestin J, Mostofsky Stewart H

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA.

出版信息

Child Neuropsychol. 2004 Sep;10(3):162-72. doi: 10.1080/09297040409609807.

Abstract

Clinicians, parents, and teachers alike have noted that individuals with ADHD often have difficulties with "time management," which has led some to suggest a primary deficit in time perception in ADHD. Previous studies have implicated the basal ganglia, cerebellum, and frontal lobes in time estimation and production, with each region purported to make different contributions to the processing and utilization of temporal information. Given the observed involvement of the frontal-subcortical networks in ADHD, we examined judgment of durations in children with ADHD (N = 27) and age- and gender-matched control subjects (N = 15). Two judgment tasks were administered: short duration (550 ms) and long duration (4 s). The two groups did not differ significantly in their judgments of short interval durations; however, subjects with ADHD performed more poorly when making judgments involving long intervals. The groups also did not differ on a judgment-of-pitch task, ruling out a generalized deficit in auditory discrimination. Selective impairment in making judgments involving long intervals is consistent with performance by patients with frontal lobe lesions and suggests that there is a deficiency in the utilization of temporal information in ADHD (possibly secondary to deficits in working memory and/or strategy utilization), rather than a problem involving a central timing mechanism.

摘要

临床医生、家长和教师都注意到,患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的个体往往在“时间管理”方面存在困难,这使得一些人认为ADHD存在时间感知方面的原发性缺陷。先前的研究表明,基底神经节、小脑和额叶参与了时间估计和生成,据称每个区域对时间信息的处理和利用都有不同的贡献。鉴于观察到额叶 - 皮质下网络在ADHD中的参与情况,我们研究了患有ADHD的儿童(N = 27)以及年龄和性别匹配的对照受试者(N = 15)对持续时间的判断。进行了两项判断任务:短持续时间(550毫秒)和长持续时间(4秒)。两组在短间隔持续时间的判断上没有显著差异;然而,患有ADHD的受试者在进行涉及长间隔的判断时表现更差。两组在音高判断任务上也没有差异,排除了听觉辨别方面的普遍缺陷。在涉及长间隔的判断中存在选择性损伤,这与额叶病变患者的表现一致,表明ADHD在时间信息的利用方面存在缺陷(可能继发于工作记忆和/或策略利用方面的缺陷),而不是涉及中央计时机制的问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验