O'Connor Richard D, Stanford Richard, Crim Courtney, Yancey Steven W, Edwards Lisa, Rickard Kathleen A, Dorinsky Paul
Sharp Rees-Stealy Medical Group, San Diego, California 92101, USA.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2004 Dec;93(6):581-8. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61267-7.
Inhaled corticosteroids are the most effective class of anti-inflammatory agents and are recommended for patients with persistent asthma.
To compare the effectiveness of (1) fluticasone propionate, 100 microg, and salmeterol, 50 microg; (2) fluticasone propionate, 100 microg; and (3) montelukast, 10 mg, as first-line maintenance treatment for persistent asthma.
Combined analysis of 4 clinical trials, 2 that compared fluticasone propionate-salmeterol with montelukast and 2 that compared fluticasone propionate with montelukast as initial asthma therapy.
The 4 studies had a total of 1,910 patients 15 years or older with symptomatic asthma previously treated with inhaled short-acting beta2-agonists alone. At the end point, there were significantly greater increases in forced expiratory volume in 1 second with fluticasone propionate-salmeterol (0.57 L; P < or = .004) vs fluticasone propionate (0.48 L) and montelukast (0.31 L) and significantly greater increases in morning peak expiratory flow rate (84.9 L/min; P < .001) vs fluticasone propionate (56.0 L/min) and montelukast (36.1 L/min). Fluticasone propionate-salmeterol significantly increased the percentage of symptom- and rescue-free days and significantly reduced albuterol use vs fluticasone propionate and montelukast (P < or = .04 for both). Patients treated with fluticasone propionate and montelukast had 2.6 and 3.6 greater risk, respectively, of having an asthma-related exacerbation vs fluticasone propionate-salmeterol users. In addition, mean daily exacerbation costs per treated patient were dollars 0.41 for fluticasone propionate-salmeterol, dollars 4.60 for fluticasone propionate, and dollars 7.57 for montelukast, whereas mean daily costs per patient exacerbation for fluticasone propionate-salmeterol, fluticasone propionate, and montelukast were dollars 29, dollars 128, and dollars 154, respectively.
Patients with symptomatic asthma previously treated with short-acting beta2-agonists only who require maintenance therapy are likely to have greater clinical benefits, lower risk of an asthma exacerbation, and reduced exacerbation-related costs when initiating therapy with fluticasone propionate-salmeterol vs fluticasone propionate or montelukast.
吸入性糖皮质激素是最有效的一类抗炎药物,推荐用于持续性哮喘患者。
比较(1)丙酸氟替卡松100微克与沙美特罗50微克;(2)丙酸氟替卡松100微克;以及(3)孟鲁司特10毫克作为持续性哮喘一线维持治疗的有效性。
对4项临床试验进行综合分析,其中2项比较了丙酸氟替卡松-沙美特罗与孟鲁司特,2项比较了丙酸氟替卡松与孟鲁司特作为初始哮喘治疗。
这4项研究共有1910例15岁及以上有症状的哮喘患者,这些患者此前仅接受吸入性短效β2激动剂治疗。在终点时,与丙酸氟替卡松(0.48升)和孟鲁司特(0.31升)相比,丙酸氟替卡松-沙美特罗组一秒用力呼气量显著增加更多(0.57升;P≤0.004),且与丙酸氟替卡松(56.0升/分钟)和孟鲁司特(36.1升/分钟)相比,早晨呼气峰值流速显著增加更多(84.9升/分钟;P<0.001)。与丙酸氟替卡松和孟鲁司特相比,丙酸氟替卡松-沙美特罗显著增加了无症状及无需急救天数的百分比,并显著减少了沙丁胺醇的使用(两者P≤0.04)。与使用丙酸氟替卡松-沙美特罗的患者相比,接受丙酸氟替卡松和孟鲁司特治疗的患者发生哮喘相关加重的风险分别高2.6倍和3.6倍。此外,每位接受治疗患者的每日加重费用,丙酸氟替卡松-沙美特罗为0.41美元,丙酸氟替卡松为4.60美元,孟鲁司特为7.57美元,而丙酸氟替卡松-沙美特罗、丙酸氟替卡松和孟鲁司特每位患者每次加重的每日费用分别为29美元、128美元和154美元。
对于此前仅接受短效β2激动剂治疗且需要维持治疗的有症状哮喘患者,与使用丙酸氟替卡松或孟鲁司特相比,起始使用丙酸氟替卡松-沙美特罗治疗可能具有更大的临床益处、更低的哮喘加重风险以及更低的加重相关费用。