Biondo Sebastiano, Parés David, Frago Ricardo, Martí-Ragué Joan, Kreisler Esther, De Oca Javier, Jaurrieta Eduardo
Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Nov;47(11):1889-97. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0688-7.
The aims of this study were to assess the prognostic value for mortality of several factors in patients with colonic obstruction and to study the differences between proximal and distal obstruction.
Two-hundred and thirty-four consecutive patients who underwent emergency surgery for colonic obstruction were studied. Patients with an obstructive lesion distal to the splenic flexure were assessed as having a distal colonic obstruction. Resection and primary anastomosis was the operation of choice in selected patients. Alternative procedures were Hartmann's procedure in high-risk patients, subtotal colectomy in cases of associated proximal colonic damage, and colostomy or intestinal bypass in the presence of irresectable lesions. Obstruction was considered proximal when the tumor was situated at the splenic flexure or proximally and a right or extended right colectomy was performed. A range of factors were investigated to estimate the probability of death: gender, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, nature of obstruction (benign vs. malign), location of the lesion (proximal vs. distal), associated proximal colonic damage and/or peritonitis, preoperative transfusion, preoperative renal failure, and laboratory data (hematocrit < or = 30 percent, hemoglobin < or = 10 g/dl, and leukocyte count >15,000/mm3). Univariate and multivariate forward steptwise logistic regression analysis was used to study the prognostic value of each significant variable in terms of mortality.
One or more complications were detected in 109 patients (46.5 percent). Death occurred in 44 patients (18.8 percent). No differences were observed between proximal and distal obstruction. Age (>70 years), American Society of Anesthesiologists III-IV score, preoperative renal failure, and the presence of proximal colon damage with or without peritonitis were significantly associated with postoperative mortality in the univariate analysis. Only American Society of Anesthesiologists score, presence of proximal colon damage, and preoperative renal failure were significant predictors of outcome in multivariate logistic regression.
Large bowel obstruction still has a high of mortality rate. An accurate preoperative evaluation of severity factors might allow stratification of patients in terms of their mortality risk and help in the decision-making process for treatment. Such an evaluation would also enable better comparison between studies performed by different authors. Principles and stratification similar to those of distal lesions should be considered in patients with proximal colonic obstruction.
本研究旨在评估结肠梗阻患者多种因素对死亡率的预后价值,并研究近端梗阻与远端梗阻之间的差异。
对234例接受结肠梗阻急诊手术的连续患者进行研究。脾曲远端存在梗阻性病变的患者被评估为远端结肠梗阻。在选定患者中,首选手术方式为切除并一期吻合。对于高危患者,替代手术为Hartmann手术;对于伴有近端结肠损伤的病例,行次全结肠切除术;对于存在不可切除病变的情况,行结肠造口术或肠旁路手术。当肿瘤位于脾曲或近端且行右半结肠或扩大右半结肠切除术时,梗阻被视为近端梗阻。研究了一系列因素以估计死亡概率:性别、年龄、美国麻醉医师协会评分、梗阻性质(良性与恶性)、病变位置(近端与远端)、是否伴有近端结肠损伤和/或腹膜炎、术前输血、术前肾衰竭以及实验室数据(血细胞比容≤30%、血红蛋白≤10 g/dl、白细胞计数>15,000/mm³)。采用单因素和多因素向前逐步逻辑回归分析来研究每个显著变量对死亡率的预后价值。
109例患者(46.5%)检测到一种或多种并发症。44例患者(18.8%)死亡。近端梗阻与远端梗阻之间未观察到差异。在单因素分析中,年龄(>70岁)、美国麻醉医师协会III-IV级评分、术前肾衰竭以及是否存在伴有或不伴有腹膜炎的近端结肠损伤与术后死亡率显著相关。在多因素逻辑回归中,只有美国麻醉医师协会评分、近端结肠损伤的存在以及术前肾衰竭是结果的显著预测因素。
大肠梗阻的死亡率仍然很高。准确的术前严重程度因素评估可能有助于根据患者的死亡风险进行分层,并有助于治疗决策过程。这样的评估还将使不同作者进行的研究之间能够更好地比较。对于近端结肠梗阻患者,应考虑与远端病变类似的原则和分层。