Most Steven B, Scholl Brian J, Clifford Erin R, Simons Daniel J
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Psychol Rev. 2005 Jan;112(1):217-42. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.217.
This article reports a theoretical and experimental attempt to relate and contrast 2 traditionally separate research programs: inattentional blindness and attention capture. Inattentional blindness refers to failures to notice unexpected objects and events when attention is otherwise engaged. Attention capture research has traditionally used implicit indices (e.g., response times) to investigate automatic shifts of attention. Because attention capture usually measures performance whereas inattentional blindness measures awareness, the 2 fields have existed side by side with no shared theoretical framework. Here, the authors propose a theoretical unification, adapting several important effects from the attention capture literature to the context of sustained inattentional blindness. Although some stimulus properties can influence noticing of unexpected objects, the most influential factor affecting noticing is a person's own attentional goals. The authors conclude that many--but not all--aspects of attention capture apply to inattentional blindness but that these 2 classes of phenomena remain importantly distinct.
本文报告了一项理论和实验尝试,旨在关联并对比两个传统上相互独立的研究项目:无意视盲和注意捕获。无意视盲是指当注意力集中在其他事情上时,未能注意到意外的物体和事件。传统上,注意捕获研究使用内隐指标(如反应时间)来研究注意力的自动转移。由于注意捕获通常测量表现,而无意视盲测量意识,这两个领域一直并存,没有共享的理论框架。在此,作者提出了一种理论上的统一,将注意捕获文献中的几个重要效应应用于持续无意视盲的情境。尽管一些刺激属性会影响对意外物体的注意,但影响注意的最具影响力的因素是一个人自身的注意力目标。作者得出结论,注意捕获的许多(但不是全部)方面适用于无意视盲,但这两类现象仍然有重要区别。