Freda Pamela U, Reyes Carlos M, Nuruzzaman Abu T, Sundeen Robert E, Khandji Alexander G, Post Kalmon D
Department of Medicine, Columbia College of Physicians & Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Pituitary. 2004;7(1):21-30. doi: 10.1023/b:pitu.0000044630.83354.f0.
Dopamine agonists have been used as adjunctive therapy for acromegaly for many years, but relatively few studies have assessed the efficacy of a newer agonist, cabergoline. Some data suggest that cabergoline may be more effective than bromocriptine, in particular for those patients whose tumors secrete both growth hormone and prolactin. In order to assess this possibility further, we have evaluated the biochemical response to cabergoline therapy in patients with acromegaly at our center. We describe first an unusual patient who presented with a pituitary macroadenoma secreting both GH and prolactin. At presentation he had elevated levels of growth hormone 6.0 microg/L, IGF-I, 722 ng/ml, and prolactin, 6000 ng/ml. Cabergoline therapy alone was highly effective in this patient and normalized his levels of all three hormones and his gonadal function as well as produced significant shrinkage of his pituitary tumor. Fourteen other patients with more typical, active postoperative acromegaly were administered cabergoline in a 6-month, open label, dose-escalation study. Mean baseline GH was 1.3 +/- .23 ng/ml and fell to a nadir of 0.85 +/- .18 ng/ml on cabergoline therapy (p = 0.03). Mean baseline IGF-I was 520 +/- 45.2 ng/ml and fell to a mean nadir during cabergoline therapy of 368 +/- 29.8 ng/ml (p = 0.0013). At the completion of the cabergoline therapy study period, however, mean IGF-I was 453 +/- 46 ng/ml, not significantly lower than the baseline value (p = 0.11). No changes in tumor sizes occurred on cabergoline therapy. Eight of 14 patients achieved a normal IGF-I at some point during the 24 weeks study period, but the efficacy of cabergoline waned with time as only 3 of 14 (21%) of patients had a persistently normal IGF-I with up to 18 months of cabergoline therapy. Six patients had modest hyperprolactinemia at diagnosis (26-142 ng/ml) and 5 patients had positive immunohistochemical staining of their tumor for prolactin, but in neither of these small groups was cabergoline therapy more effective at normalizing IGF-I than in those patients with apparently pure GH secreting tumors. Three of 14 patients (21%) had side effects that limited therapy. A trial of cabergoline as adjunctive therapy may be considered in select patients with mild disease and small tumor residuals, but the expectation for biochemical control in these patients needs to be kept low, even for tumors that co-secrete GH and prolactin.
多巴胺激动剂作为肢端肥大症的辅助治疗药物已使用多年,但评估新型激动剂卡麦角林疗效的研究相对较少。一些数据表明,卡麦角林可能比溴隐亭更有效,特别是对于那些肿瘤同时分泌生长激素和催乳素的患者。为了进一步评估这种可能性,我们在本中心评估了卡麦角林治疗肢端肥大症患者的生化反应。我们首先描述一位不寻常的患者,他患有分泌生长激素和催乳素的垂体大腺瘤。就诊时,他的生长激素水平升高至6.0微克/升,胰岛素样生长因子-I(IGF-I)为722纳克/毫升,催乳素为6000纳克/毫升。单独使用卡麦角林治疗对该患者非常有效,使他的所有三种激素水平和性腺功能恢复正常,并使垂体肿瘤显著缩小。在一项为期6个月的开放标签剂量递增研究中,另外14例更典型的、术后仍处于活动期的肢端肥大症患者接受了卡麦角林治疗。卡麦角林治疗前生长激素平均基线值为1.3±0.23纳克/毫升,治疗后降至最低点0.85±0.18纳克/毫升(p = 0.03)。胰岛素样生长因子-I平均基线值为520±45.2纳克/毫升,卡麦角林治疗期间平均降至最低点368±29.8纳克/毫升(p = 0.0013)。然而,在卡麦角林治疗研究期结束时,胰岛素样生长因子-I平均为453±46纳克/毫升,并不显著低于基线值(p = 0.11)。卡麦角林治疗期间肿瘤大小无变化。14例患者中有8例在24周研究期的某个时间点实现了胰岛素样生长因子-I正常化,但卡麦角林的疗效随时间减弱,因为在长达18个月的卡麦角林治疗后,14例患者中只有3例(21%)的胰岛素样生长因子-I持续正常。6例患者在诊断时存在轻度高催乳素血症(26 - 142纳克/毫升),5例患者肿瘤的催乳素免疫组化染色呈阳性,但在这两个小群体中,卡麦角林治疗使胰岛素样生长因子-I正常化的效果并不比那些明显单纯分泌生长激素的肿瘤患者更好。14例患者中有3例(21%)出现了限制治疗的副作用。对于部分病情较轻且肿瘤残留较小的患者,可考虑试用卡麦角林作为辅助治疗,但即使对于同时分泌生长激素和催乳素的肿瘤,对这些患者生化指标控制的预期也应保持较低水平。