Ossorio Pilar, Duster Troy
Department of Medical History and Bioethics, University of Wisconsin--Madison, Madison, WI 53706-1399, USA.
Am Psychol. 2005 Jan;60(1):115-28. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.1.115.
Among biomedical scientists, there is a great deal of controversy over the nature of race, the relevance of racial categories for research, and the proper methods of using racial variables. This article argues that researchers and scholars should avoid a binary-type argument, in which the question is whether to use race always or never. Researchers should instead focus on developing standards for when and how to use racial variables. The article then discusses 1 context, criminology, in which the use of racial variables in behavioral genetics research could be particularly problematic. If genetic studies of criminalized behavior use forensic DNA databanks or forensic genetic profiles, they will be confounded by the many racial biases of the law enforcement and penal system.
在生物医学科学家当中,关于种族的本质、种族类别与研究的相关性以及使用种族变量的恰当方法存在大量争议。本文认为,研究人员和学者应避免二元论式的争论,即不是讨论是否始终使用种族概念,而是讨论何时以及如何使用种族变量。本文接着讨论了一个领域——犯罪学,在该领域中,行为遗传学研究中使用种族变量可能会特别成问题。如果对犯罪行为的基因研究使用法医DNA数据库或法医基因图谱,那么它们将会被执法和刑罚系统中存在的诸多种族偏见所混淆。