Sucato Daniel J, Duey-Holtz Allison, Elerson Emily, Safavi Fay
Texas Scottish Rite Hospital, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jan 15;30(2):211-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000150832.53604.64.
A retrospective comparison of postoperative continuous epidural analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia following surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
To compare the safety and efficacy of continuous epidural analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia following adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.
The most commonly used pain management techniques are continuous epidural analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia. However, no large published reports compare them following adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.
A review was performed from 1990 to 2001 of patients undergoing primary surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Visual analog scale scores were recorded postoperatively at multiple time periods. Adverse effects related to each pain management technique were noted.
The average of all pain scores (1.3 vs. 1.9) (P < 0.0001) and scores at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours (p < 0.001) was significantly better in the continuous epidural analgesia group when compared to the patient-controlled analgesia group. The range of pain scores (2.3 vs. 2.7) (P < 0.05) and the average maximum score was less in the continuous epidural analgesia group (2.6 vs. 3.2) (P < 0.05). The need to temporarily stop and then restart the pain management (12.3% vs. 7.0%) (P = 0.04) and premature permanent discontinuation (13.1% vs. 0.0%) (P < 0.001) was greater in the continuous epidural analgesia group than the patient-controlled analgesia group. No neurologic injuries occurred.
Although both continuous epidural analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia provide effective pain control following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, patients with continuous epidural analgesia had significantly better pain scores for all time periods, less fluctuations in pain, and lower maximum pain levels during the postoperative period.
青少年特发性脊柱侧凸手术治疗后术后持续硬膜外镇痛与患者自控镇痛的回顾性比较。
比较青少年特发性脊柱侧凸手术后持续硬膜外镇痛与患者自控镇痛的安全性和有效性。
最常用的疼痛管理技术是持续硬膜外镇痛和患者自控镇痛。然而,尚无大型已发表报告对青少年特发性脊柱侧凸手术后的这两种方法进行比较。
对1990年至2001年接受青少年特发性脊柱侧凸初次手术的患者进行回顾。在术后多个时间段记录视觉模拟量表评分。记录与每种疼痛管理技术相关的不良反应。
与患者自控镇痛组相比,持续硬膜外镇痛组所有疼痛评分的平均值(1.3对1.9)(P<0.0001)以及术后2、4、6、8、12、24、36和48小时的评分(P<0.001)均显著更好。持续硬膜外镇痛组的疼痛评分范围(2.3对2.7)(P<0.05)以及平均最高评分更低(2.6对3.2)(P<0.05)。持续硬膜外镇痛组临时停止然后重新开始疼痛管理的需求(12.3%对7.0%)(P=0.04)以及过早永久停药的情况(13.1%对0.0%)(P<0.001)均高于患者自控镇痛组。未发生神经损伤。
虽然持续硬膜外镇痛和患者自控镇痛在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸手术后均能有效控制疼痛,但持续硬膜外镇痛的患者在所有时间段的疼痛评分均显著更好,疼痛波动更小,术后期间的最高疼痛水平更低。