Claxton Karl, Cohen Joshua T, Neumann Peter J
University of York, United Kingdom.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Feb;24(1):93-101. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.93.
Traditional conceptualizations of evidence-based medicine rely heavily on randomized controlled trials. Although initiatives to broaden definitions of evidence have been advanced, they generally have not tied evidentiary criteria formally and quantitatively to the benefits and costs involved in a decision to adopt or reject an intervention. Decision analysis provides a framework for combining information to inform the adoption decision in this manner. Value-of-information analysis, a related methodology, helps to determine whether it is worthwhile to collect additional information as well as the type of research that would be most helpful.
循证医学的传统概念严重依赖随机对照试验。尽管已经提出了拓宽证据定义的倡议,但这些倡议通常没有将证据标准与采纳或拒绝一项干预措施的决策所涉及的收益和成本进行正式的定量关联。决策分析提供了一个框架,用于以这种方式整合信息以指导采纳决策。信息价值分析是一种相关方法,有助于确定收集额外信息是否值得以及哪种研究类型最有帮助。