Suppr超能文献

证据何时充分?

When is evidence sufficient?

作者信息

Claxton Karl, Cohen Joshua T, Neumann Peter J

机构信息

University of York, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Feb;24(1):93-101. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.93.

Abstract

Traditional conceptualizations of evidence-based medicine rely heavily on randomized controlled trials. Although initiatives to broaden definitions of evidence have been advanced, they generally have not tied evidentiary criteria formally and quantitatively to the benefits and costs involved in a decision to adopt or reject an intervention. Decision analysis provides a framework for combining information to inform the adoption decision in this manner. Value-of-information analysis, a related methodology, helps to determine whether it is worthwhile to collect additional information as well as the type of research that would be most helpful.

摘要

循证医学的传统概念严重依赖随机对照试验。尽管已经提出了拓宽证据定义的倡议,但这些倡议通常没有将证据标准与采纳或拒绝一项干预措施的决策所涉及的收益和成本进行正式的定量关联。决策分析提供了一个框架,用于以这种方式整合信息以指导采纳决策。信息价值分析是一种相关方法,有助于确定收集额外信息是否值得以及哪种研究类型最有帮助。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验