Bäthis Holger, Perlick Lars, Blum Christian, Lüring Christian, Perlick Carsten, Grifka Joachim
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Regensburg, Germany.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 Oct;13(7):545-50. doi: 10.1007/s00167-004-0574-9. Epub 2005 Jan 14.
The medial parapatellar approach has become the standard technique in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, recent studies have reported superior results regarding functional recovery when using the midvastus approach. It was the aim of this study to evaluate the early functional outcome of both surgical techniques. In a prospective, double-blinded, randomized study, 50 patients for TKA were consecutively operated on either by the medial parapatellar or the midvastus approach. Exclusion criteria were defined as previous open knee surgery and leg deformity of more than 10 degrees varus or valgus. TKA was performed in all patients by one surgeon using the same type of implants in both groups. Pain scores (VAS) were documented and follow-up data including quadriceps strength and proprioception were obtained 3 weeks and 6 weeks postoperatively. Both groups were comparable in preoperative demographic data. Postoperatively, patients in the midvastus group demonstrated significantly lower pain in rest (VAS: mean 2.25 vs. 3.03) and under movement (VAS: mean 2.92 vs. 3.13). Further, they showed superior isometric quadriceps strength at 3 weeks (41.4 vs. 27.6 Nm) and 6 weeks (47.6 vs. 35.5 Nm). Moreover, this group showed a superior postoperative proprioception, while the range of motion was similar in both groups. The midvastus approach offers advantages over the standard parapatellar arthrotomy, in the early rehabilitation period. No adverse effects were observed associated with this approach. Therefore, the midvastus approach should be considered as a valuable alternative in TKA.
髌旁内侧入路已成为全膝关节置换术(TKA)的标准技术。然而,最近的研究报告称,采用股中间肌入路时功能恢复效果更佳。本研究的目的是评估这两种手术技术的早期功能结果。在一项前瞻性、双盲、随机研究中,50例行TKA的患者连续接受髌旁内侧或股中间肌入路手术。排除标准定义为既往有开放性膝关节手术史以及内翻或外翻超过10度的腿部畸形。所有患者均由一名外科医生进行TKA,两组使用相同类型的植入物。记录疼痛评分(视觉模拟评分法[VAS]),并在术后3周和6周获得包括股四头肌力量和本体感觉在内的随访数据。两组术前人口统计学数据具有可比性。术后,股中间肌组患者在静息时(VAS:平均2.25对3.03)和活动时(VAS:平均2.92对3.1)疼痛明显更低。此外,他们在术后3周(41.4对27.6牛米)和6周(47.6对35.5牛米)时等长股四头肌力量更强。而且,该组术后本体感觉更佳,而两组的活动范围相似。在早期康复阶段,股中间肌入路比标准的髌旁关节切开术具有优势。未观察到与该入路相关的不良反应。因此,股中间肌入路应被视为TKA中有价值的替代方法。