Novick A C
Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195.
Semin Urol. 1992 Feb;10(1):12-5.
Nephron-sparing surgery provides effective therapy for patients with localized RCC in whom preservation of renal function is a relevant clinical consideration. The technical success rate with this approach is excellent, and long-term patient survival free of cancer is comparable with that obtained after radical nephrectomy, particularly for stage I RCC. The major disadvantage of conservative surgery is the approximately 10% risk of postoperative local tumor recurrence. The risk of local recurrence after radical nephrectomy has not been determined but is presumably less. The indications for nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral RCC and a completely normal opposite kidney are not established, and radical nephrectomy should still be considered the treatment of choice in this setting.
保留肾单位手术为局部性肾细胞癌患者提供了有效的治疗方法,对于这些患者而言,肾功能的保留是一项重要的临床考量因素。这种手术方式的技术成功率很高,且患者长期无癌生存率与根治性肾切除术后相当,尤其是对于Ⅰ期肾细胞癌患者。保守性手术的主要缺点是术后局部肿瘤复发风险约为10%。根治性肾切除术后局部复发风险尚未明确,但推测较低。对于单侧肾细胞癌且对侧肾脏完全正常的患者,保留肾单位手术的适应证尚未确立,在这种情况下,根治性肾切除术仍应被视为首选治疗方法。