Suppr超能文献

日间膝关节关节镜手术中区域神经阻滞与硬膜外麻醉的比较。

Comparison of regional nerve block to epidural anaesthesia in day care arthroscopic surgery of the knee.

作者信息

Chakravarthy Vakati, Arya Virendra K, Dhillon Mandeep S, Chari Pramila

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Belg. 2004 Dec;70(6):551-9.

Abstract

Day care minimally invasive surgery demands minimal complications with anaesthesia. Nerve blocks are increasingly being employed for surgical procedures on the lower limb, and we attempted to evaluate their benefits and drawbacks in a prospective randomised study in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. We compared the effectiveness, onset time, duration of analgesia, patient acceptance, failure rate and post-operative comfort of epidural anaesthesia (with 20 ml of 2% lidocaine with adrenaline 1 in 200000) and peripheral nerve blocks (combined 3-in-1 and sciatic nerve block, with 50 ml of 1% lignocaine with adrenaline 1 in 200000, using nerve stimulator). Forty nine cases were randomised to receive either single shot epidural anaesthesia (Group-I, n = 23) or combined 3-in-1 and sciatic nerve block (Group-II, n = 26). The anaesthesia procedure and analgesia onset time was longer in Group-II (p < 0.001), with skin incision being significantly delayed as compared to group-I (45.2+/-6.2min vs 30.0+/-5.4 min respectively) (p < 0.001). Haemodynamic changes were comparable in both groups during the study period. All patients had complete analgesia at skin incision in group-I as compared to 89.1% in group-II (p < 0.05). However 52.2% of patients in group-I required rescue analgesia postoperatively, as compared to only 18.7% in group-II (p < 0.05). We concluded that even though combined 3-in-1 and sciatic nerve block technique has longer anaesthesia induction time, the lesser need for postoperative rescue analgesia, and lesser potential complications like inadvertent spinal puncture, retention of urine and late onset of back pain, make this an attractive option for day care arthroscopy. The use of a nerve stimulator ensures accuracy, patient counselling allows good cooperation, and advance planning can include potential skin incision delays.

摘要

日间护理微创手术要求麻醉引起的并发症最少。神经阻滞越来越多地用于下肢手术,我们试图在一项前瞻性随机研究中评估其在接受膝关节镜检查的患者中的利弊。我们比较了硬膜外麻醉(20毫升含1:200000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因)和外周神经阻滞(联合三合一和坐骨神经阻滞,50毫升含1:200000肾上腺素的1%利多卡因,使用神经刺激器)的有效性、起效时间、镇痛持续时间、患者接受度、失败率和术后舒适度。49例患者被随机分为接受单次硬膜外麻醉(第一组,n = 23)或联合三合一和坐骨神经阻滞(第二组,n = 26)。第二组的麻醉操作和镇痛起效时间更长(p < 0.001),与第一组相比,皮肤切口明显延迟(分别为45.2±6.2分钟和30.0±5.4分钟)(p < 0.001)。研究期间两组的血流动力学变化相当。与第二组的89.1%相比,第一组所有患者在皮肤切口时均有完全镇痛(p < 0.05)。然而,第一组52.2%的患者术后需要补救镇痛,而第二组仅为18.7%(p < 0.05)。我们得出结论,尽管联合三合一和坐骨神经阻滞技术的麻醉诱导时间较长,但术后补救镇痛需求较少,且潜在并发症如意外脊髓穿刺、尿潴留和迟发性背痛较少,这使其成为日间护理关节镜检查的一个有吸引力的选择。使用神经刺激器可确保准确性,患者咨询可促进良好合作,提前规划可考虑潜在的皮肤切口延迟。

相似文献

2
Comparison of spinal anesthesia with combined sciatic-femoral nerve block for outpatient knee arthroscopy.
J Clin Anesth. 2008 Sep;20(6):415-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.04.003.
9
Comparison of sciatic psoas compartment block and sciatic femoral 3-in-1 block for knee arthroscopy.
J Clin Anesth. 2007 Dec;19(8):591-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2007.06.014.

引用本文的文献

1
National trends in perioperative epidural analgesia use for surgical patients.
J Clin Anesth. 2024 Dec;99:111642. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111642. Epub 2024 Oct 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验