Phillips Christophe, Mattout Jeremie, Rugg Michael D, Maquet Pierre, Friston Karl J
Centre de Recherches du Cyclotron, B30, Université de Liège, Liège 4000, Belgium.
Neuroimage. 2005 Feb 15;24(4):997-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.030. Epub 2005 Jan 5.
Distributed linear solutions of the EEG source localisation problem are used routinely. In contrast to discrete dipole equivalent models, distributed linear solutions do not assume a fixed number of active sources and rest on a discretised fully 3D representation of the electrical activity of the brain. The ensuing inverse problem is underdetermined and constraints or priors are required to ensure the uniqueness of the solution. In a Bayesian framework, the conditional expectation of the source distribution, given the data, is attained by carefully balancing the minimisation of the residuals induced by noise and the improbability of the estimates as determined by their priors. This balance is specified by hyperparameters that control the relative importance of fitting and conforming to various constraints. Here we formulate the conventional "Weighted Minimum Norm" (WMN) solution in terms of hierarchical linear models. An "Expectation-Maximisation" (EM) algorithm is used to obtain a "Restricted Maximum Likelihood" (ReML) estimate of the hyperparameters, before estimating the "Maximum a Posteriori" solution itself. This procedure can be considered a generalisation of previous work that encompasses multiple constraints. Our approach was compared with the "classic" WMN and Maximum Smoothness solutions, using a simplified 2D source model with synthetic noisy data. The ReML solution was assessed with four types of source location priors: no priors, accurate priors, inaccurate priors, and both accurate and inaccurate priors. The ReML approach proved useful as: (1) The regularisation (or influence of the a priori source covariance) increased as the noise level increased. (2) The localisation error (LE) was negligible when accurate location priors were used. (3) When accurate and inaccurate location priors were used simultaneously, the solution was not influenced by the inaccurate priors. The ReML solution was then applied to real somatosensory-evoked responses to illustrate the application in an empirical setting.
脑电图源定位问题的分布式线性解决方案被常规使用。与离散偶极子等效模型不同,分布式线性解决方案不假定有源的固定数量,而是基于大脑电活动的离散化全三维表示。由此产生的逆问题是欠定的,需要约束条件或先验信息来确保解的唯一性。在贝叶斯框架中,给定数据的源分布的条件期望是通过仔细平衡由噪声引起的残差最小化和由先验确定的估计的不可能性来实现的。这种平衡由控制拟合和符合各种约束的相对重要性的超参数指定。在这里,我们根据分层线性模型来表述传统的“加权最小范数”(WMN)解。在估计“最大后验”解本身之前,使用“期望最大化”(EM)算法来获得超参数的“限制最大似然”(ReML)估计。这个过程可以被认为是包含多个约束的先前工作的推广。我们的方法与“经典”WMN和最大平滑度解进行了比较,使用具有合成噪声数据的简化二维源模型。使用四种类型的源位置先验对ReML解进行评估:无先验、准确先验、不准确先验以及准确和不准确先验。结果表明ReML方法很有用:(1)随着噪声水平的增加,正则化(或先验源协方差的影响)增加。(2)当使用准确的位置先验时,定位误差(LE)可以忽略不计。(3)当同时使用准确和不准确位置先验时,解不受不准确先验的影响。然后将ReML解应用于实际体感诱发电位,以说明在实证环境中的应用。