Vautier J F, Vandewalle H, Arabi H, Monod H
Laboratoire de Physiologie du Travail, Université de Paris 6, 91 bd de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.
Appl Ergon. 1995 Apr;26(2):117-21. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(95)00009-2.
The relationship between exhaustion time (t(lim)) and the work performed at the end of constant-power exercises can be described by a linear relationship (Wlim = a + b t(lim)) for work involving the whole body (eg cycling) or part of the body (eg knee extensions). The slope b in the equation is termed the critical power and has been proposed as an index of the capacity to perform work over a long period of time. The first objective of the present study was to compare the values of slopes b calculated from whole-body work of short duration, ie maximal and supra-maximal cycling exercises (slope b1), with the values calculated from the same work, the durations of which were between 3.5 and 35 min (slope b3), as in the protocols used by Scherrer and Monod (1960) for body-part work. Slope b1 was significantly higher than slope b3 in 10 subjects who performed 5 cycling exhausting exercises (60, 73, 86, 100 and 120% of maximal aerobic power (MAP) in watts). Exhaustion times corresponding to power outputs equivalent to b1 and b3 were equal to 29.0 +/- 19.1 min and 48.6 +/- 9.8 min respectively. Moreover, the exhaustion times at 60 and 73%,MAP were significantly correlated with slope b3 (expressed in %MAP) but not with slope b1. Consequently, slope b3 should be considered as the critical power instead of slope b1 as in some studies in the literature (Moritani et al, 1981). The second objective was to study the physiological significance of the critical power (slope b3) of whole-body work (cycling). The workload that corresponded to a lactate steady state was not significantly different from b3 (68.8 +/- 6.0 vs 68.7 +/- 6.3% MAP). Nevertheless, slope b3 represents a workload corresponding to a slight but significant drift of heart rate or oxygen uptake. These results probably explain why b3 is a power which can be maintained for a long time but not beyond about l h in an average subject.
对于涉及全身(如骑自行车)或身体部分(如膝关节伸展)的运动,疲劳时间(t(lim))与恒功率运动结束时所做的功之间的关系可用线性关系(Wlim = a + b t(lim))来描述。该方程中的斜率b被称为临界功率,并已被提议作为长时间做功能力的指标。本研究的首要目的是比较从短时间全身运动(即最大和超最大骑自行车运动)计算得出的斜率b值(斜率b1)与从相同运动计算得出的斜率b值,后者运动持续时间在3.5至35分钟之间(斜率b3),就如同Scherrer和Monod(1960年)用于身体局部运动的实验方案那样。在进行了5次骑自行车力竭运动(分别为最大有氧功率(MAP)的60%、73%、86%、100%和120%(以瓦特为单位))的10名受试者中,斜率b1显著高于斜率b3。对应于与b1和b3相当的功率输出的疲劳时间分别为29.0±19.1分钟和48.6±9.8分钟。此外,60%和73%MAP时的疲劳时间与斜率b3(以%MAP表示)显著相关,但与斜率b1无关。因此,应将斜率b3视为临界功率,而不是像文献中的一些研究(Moritani等人,1981年)那样将斜率b1视为临界功率。第二个目的是研究全身运动(骑自行车)的临界功率(斜率b3)的生理意义。对应于乳酸稳态的工作量与b3没有显著差异(68.8±6.0与68.7±6.3%MAP)。然而,斜率b3代表的是对应于心率或摄氧量轻微但显著漂移的工作量。这些结果可能解释了为什么b3是一种平均受试者可以长时间维持但不超过约1小时的功率。