Frankum Laura E, Nightengale Brian, Russo Cynthia L, Sarnes Matt
Applied Health Outcomes, Palm Harbor, Florida, USA.
Manag Care Interface. 2005 Jan;18(1):55-63.
This study examines the budgetary effect of using ciclopirox, itraconazole (pulse treatment), terbinafine, or itraconazole (continuous treatment) as first-, second-, or third-line therapy in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis by determining which therapeutic sequence is most cost effective. Using a disease treatment pathway model, alternative agents were compared based on cost per clinical response. The results from this sequential treatment analysis demonstrated that ciclopirox followed by itraconazole pulse and then terbinafine provides the lowest-cost approach to the treatment of onychomycosis (dollar 757.89 per clinical response), followed by the sequence of ciclopirox, terbinafine, and itraconazole pulse (dollar 796.13 per clinical response). This study provides a framework for formulary decision makers to evaluate a sequential treatment pathway that resembles actual practice.
本研究通过确定哪种治疗顺序最具成本效益,来考察使用环吡酮、伊曲康唑(冲击治疗)、特比萘芬或伊曲康唑(连续治疗)作为一线、二线或三线疗法治疗趾甲甲真菌病的预算影响。使用疾病治疗途径模型,根据每临床反应成本对替代药物进行比较。该序贯治疗分析的结果表明,先用环吡酮,再用伊曲康唑冲击治疗,然后用特比萘芬,是治疗甲真菌病成本最低的方法(每临床反应757.89美元),其次是环吡酮、特比萘芬和伊曲康唑冲击治疗的顺序(每临床反应796.13美元)。本研究为处方决策者评估类似实际临床实践的序贯治疗途径提供了一个框架。