Lee Eun-Sook, Kim Sung-Hyo, Kim Jung-Sook
Department of Nursing, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwang-ju 501-746, Korea.
Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi. 2004 Dec;34(7):1315-25. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2004.34.7.1315.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a closed endotracheal suction system(CES) on oxygen saturation, ventilator associated pneumonia(VAP), and nursing efficacy in mechanically ventilated patients.
This study was conducted in the intensive care unit of a University Hospital in Gwangju City. Data was collected from July to October, 2003. Seventy mechanically ventilated patients were randomly divided into two groups; 32 for CES and 38 for open endotracheal suction system(OES) protocol. Twenty one nurses were also involved to examine the nurses' attitude of usefulness about CES.
SaO(2) was significantly different between CES and OES. The incidence of VAP in CES was lower than that of OES. Nursing efficacy was related to time, cost, and usefulness of the suction system. Time of suctioning in CES was shorter than that of OES. CES also contributed significantly to lower the cost of treatment than OES. The usefulness score of CES increased after 6 months of use.
CES prevented VAP, was cost effective, and a safe suctioning system. CES ncan be used with patients with sensitivity to hypoxygenation and with a high risk of VAP.
本研究旨在探讨密闭式气管内吸痰系统(CES)对机械通气患者的氧饱和度、呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)及护理效果的影响。
本研究在光州市一家大学医院的重症监护病房进行。数据收集于2003年7月至10月。70例机械通气患者被随机分为两组;32例采用CES,38例采用开放式气管内吸痰系统(OES)方案。21名护士也参与其中,以调查护士对CES有用性的态度。
CES和OES之间的SaO₂ 有显著差异。CES组的VAP发生率低于OES组。护理效果与吸痰系统的时间、成本和有用性有关。CES的吸痰时间比OES短。与OES相比,CES也显著降低了治疗成本。使用6个月后,CES的有用性评分有所提高。
CES可预防VAP,具有成本效益,是一种安全的吸痰系统。CES可用于对低氧敏感且VAP风险高的患者。