Schoenen J, Di Clemente L, Vandenheede M, Fumal A, De Pasqua V, Mouchamps M, Remacle J-M, de Noordhout A Maertens
Headache Research Unit, University Department of Neurology, CHR Citadelle, Bd du XIIème de Ligne, B-4000 Liège, Belgium.
Brain. 2005 Apr;128(Pt 4):940-7. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh411. Epub 2005 Feb 2.
We enrolled six patients suffering from refractory chronic cluster headache in a pilot trial of neurostimulation of the ipsilateral ventroposterior hypothalamus using the stereotactic coordinates published previously. After the varying durations needed to determine optimal stimulation parameters and a mean follow-up of 14.5 months, the clinical outcome is excellent in three patients (two are pain-free; one has fewer than three attacks per month), but unsatisfactory in one patient, who only has had transient remissions. Mean voltage is 3.28 V, diplopia being the major factor limiting its increase. When the stimulator was switched off in one pain-free patient, attacks resumed after 3 months until it was turned on again. In one patient the implantation procedure had to be interrupted because of a panic attack with autonomic disturbances. Another patient died from an intracerebral haemorrhage that developed along the lead tract several hours after surgery; there were no other vascular changes on post-mortem examination. After 1 month, the hypothalamic stimulation induced resistance against the attack-triggering agent nitroglycerin and tended to increase pain thresholds at extracephalic, but not at cephalic, sites. It had no detectable effect on neurohypophyseal hormones or melatonin excretion. We conclude that hypothalamic stimulation has remarkable efficacy in most, but not all, patients with treatment-resistant chronic cluster headache. Its efficacy is not due to a simple analgesic effect or to hormonal changes. Intracerebral haemorrhage cannot be neglected in the risk evaluation of the procedure. Whether it might be more prevalent than in deep-brain stimulation for movement disorders remains to be determined.
我们招募了6名患有难治性慢性丛集性头痛的患者,采用先前发表的立体定向坐标对同侧腹后下丘脑进行神经刺激的初步试验。在确定最佳刺激参数所需的不同持续时间以及平均14.5个月的随访之后,3例患者的临床结果极佳(2例无疼痛;1例每月发作少于3次),但1例患者效果不满意,仅出现短暂缓解。平均电压为3.28V,复视是限制其增加的主要因素。在1例无疼痛的患者中关闭刺激器后,3个月后发作恢复,直到再次打开刺激器。1例患者因伴有自主神经紊乱的惊恐发作而不得不中断植入手术。另1例患者在术后数小时死于沿导线通道发生的脑出血;尸检未发现其他血管变化。1个月后,下丘脑刺激诱导对诱发发作的药物硝酸甘油产生抵抗,并倾向于提高颅外而非颅内部位的疼痛阈值。对神经垂体激素或褪黑素排泄没有可检测到的影响。我们得出结论,下丘脑刺激对大多数但并非所有治疗抵抗性慢性丛集性头痛患者具有显著疗效。其疗效并非由于简单的镇痛作用或激素变化。在该手术的风险评估中,脑出血不容忽视。它是否比用于运动障碍的深部脑刺激更常见仍有待确定。