Alpers Georg W, Wilhelm Frank H, Roth Walton T
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2005 Feb;114(1):126-39. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.114.1.126.
A comprehensive assessment of fear or anxiety requires measurement of both self-report and physiological responses. Respiratory abnormalities have been rarely examined during real-life exposure, although they are an integral part of fear. Twenty-one women with a specific driving phobia and 17 nonphobic women were psychophysiologically monitored during 2 highway-driving sessions; phobic women completed an additional session. Respiratory movements, end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide, an electrocardiogram, skin conductance, and skin temperature were recorded. Phobic patients differed from control participants both physiologically and experientially before, during, and after exposure. Effect size during exposure was large for the authors' measure of hyperventilation. Discriminant analysis indicated that multiple physiological measures contributed nonredundant information and correctly classified 95% of phobic and control participants. Thus, selected respiratory and autonomic measures are valid diagnostic and therapeutic outcome criteria for this situational phobia.
对恐惧或焦虑进行全面评估需要同时测量自我报告和生理反应。尽管呼吸异常是恐惧的一个组成部分,但在现实生活暴露期间很少对其进行检查。21名患有特定驾驶恐惧症的女性和17名无恐惧症的女性在两次高速公路驾驶过程中接受了心理生理监测;患有恐惧症的女性还完成了一次额外的驾驶过程。记录了呼吸运动、呼气末二氧化碳分压、心电图、皮肤电导率和皮肤温度。在暴露前、暴露期间和暴露后,恐惧症患者在生理和体验方面均与对照组参与者不同。对于作者所测量的过度换气,暴露期间的效应量很大。判别分析表明,多种生理测量提供了非冗余信息,并正确分类了95%的恐惧症患者和对照组参与者。因此,所选的呼吸和自主测量指标是这种情境性恐惧症有效的诊断和治疗结果标准。