Suppr超能文献

老年患者及全科医生对患者参与的不同方法的看法:一项国际质性访谈研究。

Elderly patients' and GPs' views on different methods for patient involvement: an international qualitative interview study.

作者信息

Geest Tina Aaen, Wetzels Raymond, Raposo Victor, Lopes Ferreira Pedro, Baker Richard, Wensing Michel, Olesen Frede

机构信息

Research Unit for General Practice, University of Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2005 Apr;22(2):184-91. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh733. Epub 2005 Feb 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients' interaction with the GP may be improved through patient involvement techniques, and there is a variety of such techniques which improve patients' involvement in their own care, although little is known about their acceptability.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators for using patient information leaflets and patient satisfaction questionnaires as methods for increasing elderly patients' involvement in general practice care by comparing their views with the GPs' views on these two types of methods.

METHODS

In seven countries (Austria, Denmark, Germany, The Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia and Switzerland) 146 GPs and 284 patients aged 70 and over were interviewed about the use and the acceptability of these two methods. Interviewers followed a semi-structured interview guide, and all interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed verbatim.

RESULTS

The arguments for using patient satisfaction questionnaires were that they would provide the GP with more information, function as a basis for change, increase patients' self-confidence and make them more conscious of what to expect. Barriers for their use were cognitive impairment among patients, fear that they would not answer honestly and opposition to written material. The arguments for patient information leaflets were that they could support patients' memories, educate patients and promote their self-responsibility. The barriers were cognitive impairment among patients and fear that they would give them false impressions of what to expect.

CONCLUSION

Both instruments were generally well accepted by both GPs and patients. Their use seemed to be dependent upon the individual GP's attitude and the patients' cognitive capacities.

摘要

背景

通过患者参与技术可以改善老年患者与全科医生的互动,有多种此类技术可提高患者对自身护理的参与度,尽管对其可接受性知之甚少。

目的

本研究的目的是通过比较老年患者和全科医生对患者信息手册和患者满意度问卷这两种方法的看法,确定将其作为增加老年患者参与全科医疗护理的方法的障碍和促进因素。

方法

在七个国家(奥地利、丹麦、德国、荷兰、葡萄牙、斯洛文尼亚和瑞士),对146名全科医生和284名70岁及以上的患者进行了关于这两种方法的使用和可接受性的访谈。访谈者遵循半结构化访谈指南,所有访谈均进行录音并逐字转录。

结果

使用患者满意度问卷的理由是,它们能为全科医生提供更多信息,作为变革的基础,增强患者的自信心,并使他们更清楚期望的内容。使用这些问卷的障碍包括患者的认知障碍、担心他们不会如实回答以及对书面材料的抵触。患者信息手册的理由是,它们可以帮助患者记忆、教育患者并促进他们的自我责任感。障碍是患者的认知障碍以及担心手册会给他们对期望内容造成错误印象。

结论

这两种工具总体上都得到了全科医生和患者的认可。它们的使用似乎取决于全科医生的个人态度和患者的认知能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验