Tömösvári Adrienn, Mencser Zoltán, Futó Judit, Hortobágyi Anna, Bodosi Mihály, Barzó Pál
Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Altalános Orvostudományi Kar, Aneszteziológiai és Intenzív Terápiás Intézet, Szeged.
Orv Hetil. 2005 Jan 23;146(4):159-64.
The contribution of brain edema to brain swelling in cases of traumatic brain injury remains a critical problem. In head injury, the swelling and eventual rise in intracranial pressure is a frequent cause of death, and in survivors the poor prognosis with sustained elevation of ICP has been well documented.
The objective this study was to evaluate the effect of controlled lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage in adult patients with refractory intracranial hypertension following severe brain injury.
The study involved 10 head injured patients (GCS < or = 8) with medically refractory intracranial hypertension. Aggressive treatment included the repeated steps of the Brain Trauma Foundation's guidelines, barbiturate coma and in many cases decompressive craniectomy as well. After institution of a lumbar drain, cerebrospinal fluid drainage was maintained under control of intracranial pressure (ICP) and neurological status. ICP and cerebral perfusion pressure before and after initiation of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage and related complications were documented.
All patients demonstrated an immediate decrease of ICP (from 30.6 +/- 4.7 mm Hg to 11.5 +/- 3.9 mm Hg, mean +/- SD) and a concomitant increase of cerebral perfusion pressure. In seven patients the decrease of ICP was long lasting and 5 of them had a favourable outcome. Two patients survived with a severe permanent neurologic deficit and only three patients died because of the progressive brain edema, which developed despite of the maximum therapy.
In conclusion we may consider, that controlled lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage is a potentially useful treatment in cases of severe traumatic brain injury when maximal medical therapy and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid evacuation have failed to control high intracranial hypertension. The danger of herniation is minimized by considering lumbar drainage in the presence of discernible basilar cisterns only.
在创伤性脑损伤病例中,脑水肿对脑肿胀的作用仍然是一个关键问题。在头部损伤中,肿胀以及颅内压最终升高是常见的死亡原因,并且在幸存者中,颅内压持续升高导致的预后不良已有充分记录。
本研究的目的是评估控制性腰段脑脊液引流对重度脑损伤后难治性颅内高压成年患者的影响。
该研究纳入了10例头部受伤(格拉斯哥昏迷评分≤8分)且药物治疗难治性颅内高压的患者。积极治疗包括重复遵循脑创伤基金会指南的步骤、巴比妥类药物昏迷治疗,并且在许多情况下还进行了减压颅骨切除术。在置入腰大池引流管后,在颅内压(ICP)和神经状态的控制下维持脑脊液引流。记录腰段脑脊液引流开始前后的ICP和脑灌注压以及相关并发症。
所有患者的ICP均立即下降(从30.6±4.7 mmHg降至11.5±3.9 mmHg,平均值±标准差),同时脑灌注压升高。7例患者的ICP下降持续时间较长,其中5例预后良好。2例患者存活但有严重的永久性神经功能缺损,仅3例患者因尽管采取了最大程度治疗仍发生的进行性脑水肿而死亡。
总之,我们可以认为,当最大程度的药物治疗和脑室脑脊液引流未能控制高颅内压时,控制性腰段脑脊液引流在重度创伤性脑损伤病例中是一种潜在有用的治疗方法。仅在存在可识别的基底池时考虑腰段引流可将脑疝的风险降至最低。