Harwood Paul John, Giannoudis Peter V, van Griensven Martijn, Krettek Christian, Pape Hans-Christoph
Department of Trauma Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
J Trauma. 2005 Mar;58(3):446-52; discussion 452-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000153942.28015.77.
Recently, there has been a move away from early total care in patients with severe, multiple injuries to damage control orthopedics (DCO) in an attempt to limit the physiologic insult resulting from operative treatment after trauma. For femoral shaft fracture, this entails initial external fixation and subsequent conversion to an intramedullary nail (IMN). We sought to quantify the inflammatory response to initial surgery and conversion and link this to subsequent organ dysfunction and complications.
Patients with femoral shaft fracture and a New Injury Severity Score of 20 or more were included. Data were retrospectively collected for 4 days at admission and at exchange procedure (external fixation to intramedullary nail), and the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) score and the Marshall multiorgan dysfunction score were calculated.
One hundred seventy-four patients met the inclusion criteria. The DCO group had significantly more severe injuries (New Injury Severity Score of 25.4 vs. 36.2, p < 0.0001) and significantly more head and thoracic injuries (both p < 0.0001). The mean SIRS score was significantly higher in the IMN group, from 12 hours until 72 hours postoperatively (p < 0.05). The mean peak postoperative SIRS score was significantly higher in the IMN group than in the DCO group, at the primary procedure and at conversion, as was the time with an SIRS score greater than 1. At conversion in the DCO group, the preoperative SIRS score correlated with magnitude and duration of elevation in the SIRS and multiorgan dysfunction scores (p < 0.0001).
It would appear that despite more severe injuries in the DCO group, patients had a smaller, shorter postoperative SIRS and did not suffer significantly more pronounced organ failure than the IMN group. DCO patients undergoing conversion while their SIRS score was raised suffered the most pronounced subsequent inflammatory response and organ failure. According to these data, DCO treatment was associated with a lesser systemic inflammatory response than early total care for femur fractures. The inflammatory status of the patient may be a useful adjunct in clinical decision making regarding the timing of conversion to an intramedullary device.
最近,对于严重多发伤患者的治疗已从早期全面治疗转向损伤控制骨科(DCO),以试图限制创伤后手术治疗所导致的生理损伤。对于股骨干骨折,这需要首先进行外固定,随后再转换为髓内钉(IMN)。我们试图量化对初次手术及转换手术的炎症反应,并将其与随后的器官功能障碍及并发症联系起来。
纳入新损伤严重程度评分达20分或更高的股骨干骨折患者。回顾性收集入院时及换药过程(从外固定转换为髓内钉)4天的数据,并计算全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)评分及马歇尔多器官功能障碍评分。
174例患者符合纳入标准。DCO组损伤明显更严重(新损伤严重程度评分25.4比36.2,p<0.0001),头部和胸部损伤也明显更多(均p<0.0001)。IMN组术后12小时至72小时的平均SIRS评分显著更高(p<0.05)。在初次手术及转换手术时,IMN组术后SIRS评分的平均峰值显著高于DCO组,SIRS评分大于1的时间也是如此。在DCO组转换手术时,术前SIRS评分与SIRS及多器官功能障碍评分升高的幅度和持续时间相关(p<0.0001)。
似乎尽管DCO组损伤更严重,但与IMN组相比,患者术后SIRS反应更小、持续时间更短,且器官功能衰竭并不更明显。SIRS评分升高时接受转换手术的DCO患者随后的炎症反应和器官功能衰竭最为明显。根据这些数据,与股骨干骨折的早期全面治疗相比,DCO治疗引起的全身炎症反应较小。患者的炎症状态可能有助于临床决策髓内固定装置转换的时机。