Lobo Renata D, Levin Anna Sara, Gomes Laura M Brasileiro, Cursino Rosa, Park Marcelo, Figueiredo Valquiria B, Taniguchi Leandro, Polido Cilmara G, Costa Silvia Figueiredo
Infection Control Hospital Committee, Hospital das Clínicas, Department of Infectious Diseases, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Am J Infect Control. 2005 Mar;33(2):83-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.05.003.
Central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CVC-BSI) are a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality in intensive care settings. Many strategies have been used to decrease the risk of CVC-BSI; however, few studies have explored the educational intervention as an approach to reduce the CVC-BSI rates.
The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of an educational program targeted to specific points observed during CVC care practices on decreasing CVC-BSI in a medical intensive care unit.
An educational program was developed by a multidisciplinary task force to highlight correct practices for CVC care. Relative risk ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and P values were determined for all primary and secondary outcomes. The chi 2 linear test for trends of CVC-BSI rates was performed during the study period and the following year.
Forty-eight primary bloodstream infections occurred in 2450 catheter-days (20 per 1000 catheter-days) in the 16 months before the intervention. After the educational intervention and policy changes such as standardized povidone-iodine use during dressing care, the number of CVC-BSI dropped to 16 in 1381 catheter-days (11 per 1000 catheter-days), a decrease of 40%. The rate of CVC-BSI remained almost the same, 22 in 1701 catheter-days (12 per 1000 catheter-days), during the following year after the educational intervention (P = .07). The distribution of pathogens was different comparing the pre- and postintervention period. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen in preintervention, decreasing significantly during the study period (P = .02). The adhesion to the overall catheter care policy improved significantly in the postintervention period (P < .01).
A multiple approach included an educational strategy, targeted to specific problems observed during a careful evaluation of CVC care practices, and policy changes can decrease rates of CVC-BSI. However, despite the good results, our rates are still high, and reinforcement of CVC care practices will be continued.
中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CVC-BSI)是重症监护环境中发病和死亡的常见原因。人们已经采用了多种策略来降低CVC-BSI的风险;然而,很少有研究探索将教育干预作为降低CVC-BSI发生率的一种方法。
本研究的目的是确定针对CVC护理实践中观察到的特定要点的教育项目对降低医疗重症监护病房中CVC-BSI的影响。
一个多学科工作组制定了一个教育项目,以突出CVC护理的正确做法。确定了所有主要和次要结局的相对风险比、95%置信区间和P值。在研究期间及随后一年对CVC-BSI发生率的趋势进行了卡方线性检验。
在干预前的16个月中,2450个导管日发生了48例原发性血流感染(每1000个导管日20例)。在教育干预和政策改变(如在换药护理中标准化使用聚维酮碘)后,CVC-BSI的数量在1381个导管日降至16例(每1000个导管日11例),下降了40%。在教育干预后的次年,CVC-BSI的发生率几乎保持不变,在1701个导管日中有22例(每1000个导管日12例)(P = 0.07)。比较干预前后时期,病原体的分布有所不同。金黄色葡萄球菌是干预前最常见的病原体,在研究期间显著减少(P = 0.02)。在干预后时期,对整体导管护理政策的依从性显著提高(P < 0.01)。
一种包括教育策略的多方法途径,针对在仔细评估CVC护理实践中观察到的特定问题,以及政策改变,可以降低CVC-BSI的发生率。然而,尽管取得了良好的结果,我们的发生率仍然很高,并且将继续加强CVC护理实践。