Elung-Jensen Thomas, Heisterberg Jens, Sonne Jesper, Strandgaard Svend, Kamper Anne-Lise
Department of Nephrology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Apr;61(2):87-96. doi: 10.1007/s00228-005-0893-x. Epub 2005 Mar 11.
In chronic renal failure, clearance of enalapril is reduced. Hence, a renoprotective effect may be achieved with lower doses than conventionally used. Since marked inter-patient variation in concentrations of enalaprilat has been shown in patients with renal failure despite equivalent dosage of enalapril, a direct comparison of the effect of high versus low plasma concentrations of enalaprilat on the progression of renal failure was undertaken.
Forty patients with a median glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 17 (6-35) ml/min/1.73 m2 were studied in an open-label, randomised trial comparing patients with a high (>50 ng/ml) with patients with a low (<10 ng/ml) target trough plasma concentration of enalaprilat. The dose of enalapril was titrated accordingly. The patients were followed for 12 months or until they needed renal replacement therapy. GFR was measured at 3-month intervals by the plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA, and the individual rates of progression of renal failure were calculated as the slope of GFR versus time plot.
In the high-concentration group, the median enalaprilat trough concentration was 92.9 ng/ml (21.8-371.0 ng/ml) and in the low-concentration group it was 9.1 ng/ml (2.5-74.8 ng/ml) at 3 months follow-up (P<0.001). The median daily doses of enalapril were 10 mg (2.5-30 mg) and 1.88 mg (1.25-5 mg) in the high and low groups, respectively (P<0.001). In the high-concentration group, the mean+/-SE decline in renal function was 6.1+/-1.5 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year and in the low-concentration group it was 4.3+/-14.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year (P=0.48). Five patients in the high-concentration group reached end-stage renal failure whereas none in the low-concentration group did (P=0.04). There were no statistically significant differences in blood pressure level, concomitant antihypertensive therapy or urinary albumin excretion. However, the high-enalaprilat concentration group had an overall higher plasma potassium concentration of 0.42 mmol/l than the low group (P<0.001).
In patients with moderate to severe renal insufficiency, a low concentration of enalaprilat afforded the same degree of renoprotection, blood pressure control and minimisation of proteinuria as a high concentration, during 12 months of follow-up. The high-dosage treatment was associated with a more pronounced tendency to hyperkalaemia. Thus, there seems to be no indication for increasing the daily dose of enalapril beyond what achieves adequate blood pressure control in this group of patients.
在慢性肾衰竭中,依那普利的清除率降低。因此,与传统使用剂量相比,较低剂量可能会产生肾脏保护作用。由于尽管依那普利剂量相当,但肾衰竭患者中依那普利拉浓度存在显著的个体间差异,因此对高血浆浓度与低血浆浓度的依那普利拉对肾衰竭进展的影响进行了直接比较。
在一项开放标签、随机试验中,对40例肾小球滤过率(GFR)中位数为17(6 - 35)ml/min/1.73 m²的患者进行了研究,将目标谷浓度依那普利拉高(>50 ng/ml)的患者与低(<10 ng/ml)的患者进行比较。依那普利的剂量相应地进行滴定。对患者随访12个月或直至他们需要肾脏替代治疗。每隔3个月通过51Cr - EDTA的血浆清除率测量GFR,并将个体肾衰竭进展率计算为GFR与时间关系图的斜率。
在高浓度组,随访3个月时依那普利拉谷浓度中位数为92.9 ng/ml(21.8 - 371.0 ng/ml),低浓度组为9.1 ng/ml(2.5 - 74.8 ng/ml)(P<0.001)。高、低组依那普利的每日剂量中位数分别为10 mg(2.5 - 30 mg)和1.88 mg(1.25 - 5 mg)(P<0.001)。在高浓度组,肾功能的平均±标准误下降为每年6.1±1.5 ml/min/1.73 m²,低浓度组为每年4.3±14.4 ml/min/1.73 m²(P = 0.48)。高浓度组中有5例患者达到终末期肾衰竭,而低浓度组中无患者达到(P = 0.04)。血压水平、联合抗高血压治疗或尿白蛋白排泄方面无统计学显著差异。然而,高依那普利拉浓度组的总体血浆钾浓度比低浓度组高0.42 mmol/l(P<0.001)。
在中度至重度肾功能不全患者中,在12个月的随访期间,低浓度的依那普利拉与高浓度一样,能提供相同程度的肾脏保护、血压控制和蛋白尿最小化。高剂量治疗与更明显的高钾血症倾向相关。因此,在这类患者中,似乎没有迹象表明要将依那普利的每日剂量增加到超过实现充分血压控制所需的剂量。