Stanley Jessica L, Bartholomew Kim, Oram Doug
Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6.
J Sex Res. 2004 Nov;41(4):381-9. doi: 10.1080/00224490409552245.
This study examined childhood sexual abuse (CSA) in gay and bisexual men. We compared the conventional definition of CSA based on age difference with a modified definition of CSA based on perception to evaluate which definition best accounted for problems in adjustment. The sample consisted of 192 gay and bisexual men recruited from a randomly selected community sample. Men's descriptions of their CSA experiences were coded from taped interviews. Fifty men (26%) reported sexual experiences before age 17 with someone at least 5 years older, constituting CSA according to the age-based definition. Of these men, 24 (49%) perceived their sexual experiences as negative, coercive, and/or abusive and thus were categorized as perception-based CSA. Participants with perception-based CSA experiences reported higher levels of maladjustment than non-CSA participants. Participants with age-based CSA experiences who perceived their sexual experience as non-negative, noncoercive, and nonabusive were similar to non-CSA participants in their levels of adjustment. These findings suggest that a perception-based CSA definition more accurately represents harmful CSA experiences in gay and bisexual men than the conventional age-based definition.
本研究调查了男同性恋者和双性恋男性童年期遭受性虐待(CSA)的情况。我们将基于年龄差异的CSA传统定义与基于认知的CSA修正定义进行比较,以评估哪种定义最能解释适应方面的问题。样本包括从随机抽取的社区样本中招募的192名男同性恋者和双性恋男性。通过对录音访谈中男性对其CSA经历的描述进行编码。50名男性(26%)报告在17岁之前与至少大5岁的人有过性经历,根据基于年龄的定义,这构成了CSA。在这些男性中,24名(49%)认为他们的性经历是负面的、强迫性的和/或虐待性的,因此被归类为基于认知的CSA。有基于认知的CSA经历的参与者报告的适应不良水平高于非CSA参与者。有基于年龄的CSA经历但认为其性经历是非负面、非强迫性和非虐待性的参与者,其适应水平与非CSA参与者相似。这些发现表明,与传统的基于年龄的定义相比,基于认知的CSA定义更准确地反映了男同性恋者和双性恋男性中有害的CSA经历。