Fritz N, Schmidt C, Yamaguchi T
Physiologisches Institut, Universität München, Federal Republic of Germany.
Exp Brain Res. 1992;88(2):411-21. doi: 10.1007/BF02259116.
In anesthetized cats single motor units (MUs) of the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) and extensor digitorum communis (EDC) muscles were selectively activated by stimulation of cervical ventral root filaments. The distribution of force developed by single MUs at the four distal tendons of the EDC muscle and at three portions of the distal tendon of the ECU muscle was analysed. In general, single MUs of both muscles distributed force over all tendons in a unimodal pattern, with the maximal force levels generated at one specific tendon which was termed the best-tendon. Distributions of force were quantitatively described by a parameter representing the mean direction of force output (output-index) and a further one representing the dispersion of force over the distal tendons (divergence). Generally, these parameters and the best-tendon remained stable when a MU was stimulated at different frequencies, but varied from MU to MU. Despite the general stability of the force distribution, slight systematic changes were regularly found in EDC MUs, when they developed a higher amount of force due to a higher frequency of stimulation: the relative amount of force at the best-tendon increased; e.g. the MUs got more selective for the best-tendon. These changes were partly due to overcoming mechanical cross-coupling between neighbouring compartments of the EDC muscle. Such changes of force distribution were only found in a part of the ECU MUs; other ECU MUs did not change their force distribution at all or became less selective for the best-tendon. The phenomenon that MUs of multi-tendoned muscles distribute their force output to the distal tendons in specific patterns is probably due to mechanical partitioning of the parent muscles: the localization of spatial territories of MUs within different anatomical muscle compartments should correspond to the best-tendon. Complex mechanisms allowing passive transmission of force from limited territories along the transverse axis of both muscles must be assumed in order to explain why most MUs act on all tendons and why force distributions change with increasing stimulus frequency. In addition, specific relations between unit type and force distributions were found within both muscles. Fatigue-resistant EDC MUs have broader force distributions than fatigue-sensitive EDC MUs and slow ECU MUs were found to act predominantly on the most ulnar part of the distal tendon. These biomechanical properties of MUs are discussed as supporting the specific functions of the respective muscles.
在麻醉猫中,通过刺激颈前根细丝选择性激活尺侧腕伸肌(ECU)和指总伸肌(EDC)的单个运动单位(MU)。分析了单个运动单位在指总伸肌的四条远端肌腱以及尺侧腕伸肌远端肌腱的三个部分所产生的力的分布情况。一般来说,这两块肌肉的单个运动单位以单峰模式将力分布在所有肌腱上,在一条特定的肌腱上产生最大力水平,这条肌腱被称为最佳肌腱。力的分布通过一个代表力输出平均方向的参数(输出指数)和另一个代表力在远端肌腱上分散程度的参数(离散度)进行定量描述。通常,当以不同频率刺激一个运动单位时,这些参数和最佳肌腱保持稳定,但不同运动单位之间存在差异。尽管力的分布总体稳定,但在指总伸肌运动单位中,当它们因更高的刺激频率产生更大的力时,经常会发现轻微的系统性变化:最佳肌腱处的相对力值增加;例如,运动单位对最佳肌腱的选择性更高。这些变化部分是由于克服了指总伸肌相邻隔室之间的机械交叉耦合。这种力分布的变化仅在一部分尺侧腕伸肌运动单位中发现;其他尺侧腕伸肌运动单位根本没有改变其力分布,或者对最佳肌腱的选择性降低。多腱肌肉的运动单位以特定模式将其力输出分布到远端肌腱的现象可能是由于母肌肉的机械划分:运动单位在不同解剖肌肉隔室内的空间区域定位应与最佳肌腱相对应。为了解释为什么大多数运动单位作用于所有肌腱以及为什么力分布随刺激频率增加而变化,必须假定存在允许力从有限区域沿两块肌肉横轴被动传递的复杂机制。此外,在这两块肌肉中都发现了运动单位类型与力分布之间的特定关系。抗疲劳的指总伸肌运动单位的力分布比易疲劳的指总伸肌运动单位更宽,并且发现慢肌纤维型的尺侧腕伸肌主要作用于远端肌腱的最尺侧部分。讨论了运动单位的这些生物力学特性对各自肌肉特定功能的支持作用。