Bridge Gillian
Department of Social Policy, LSE, Houghton street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
Soc Work Health Care. 2004;39(1-2):89-105.
In the Eastern European countries included in the communist system of the USSR, parents of disabled children were encouraged to commit their disabled child to institutional care. There were strict legal regulations excluding them from schools. Medical assessments were used for care decisions. Nevertheless many parents decided to care for their disabled child at home within the family. Ukraine became an independent country in 1991, when communism was replaced by liberal democracy within a free market system. Western solutions have been sought for many social problems existing, but 'hidden,' under the old regime. For more of the parents of disabled children, this has meant embracing ideas of caring for their disabled children in the community, and providing for their social, educational, and medical needs, which have previously been denied. The issue of disability is a serious one for Ukraine where the nuclear disaster at Chernobyl in 1986 caused extensive radiation poisoning. This almost certainly led to an increase in the number of disabled children being born and an increase in the incidence of various forms of cancer. This paper is based on a series of observation visits to some of the many self-help groups established by parents, usually mothers, for their disabled children. It draws attention to the emotional stress experienced both by parents and their disabled children in the process of attempting to come to terms with the disabling conditions, and the denial of the normal rights of childhood resulting from prejudice, poor resources, ignorance, and restrictive legislation. Attempts have been made to identify the possible role and tasks of professional social workers within this context. International comparisons show that many parents and their children do not benefit from the medical model of disability, and that serious consequences include the development of depressive illness among those who find that little help is available from public services.
在苏联共产主义体系中的东欧国家,残疾儿童的父母被鼓励将残疾子女送去机构照料。有严格的法律规定禁止他们上学。医疗评估被用于照料决策。然而,许多父母决定在家中由家庭照顾他们的残疾子女。1991年乌克兰成为独立国家,当时共产主义被自由市场体系下的自由民主所取代。人们一直在寻求西方的解决方案来解决旧政权下存在但“隐藏”的许多社会问题。对于更多残疾儿童的父母来说,这意味着接受在社区中照顾残疾子女的理念,并满足他们以前被剥夺的社会、教育和医疗需求。残疾问题在乌克兰是一个严重的问题,1986年切尔诺贝利核灾难导致了广泛的辐射中毒。这几乎肯定导致了残疾儿童出生数量的增加以及各种癌症发病率的上升。本文基于对许多由父母(通常是母亲)为残疾子女成立的自助团体进行的一系列观察访问。它提请人们注意父母及其残疾子女在试图应对致残状况的过程中所经历的情感压力,以及由于偏见、资源匮乏、无知和限制性立法而导致的儿童正常权利被剥夺的情况。人们已尝试确定专业社会工作者在此背景下可能发挥的作用和承担的任务。国际比较表明,许多父母及其子女并未从残疾医学模式中受益,严重后果包括那些发现公共服务几乎无法提供帮助的人患上抑郁症。