Clayton Josephine M, Butow Phyllis N, Arnold Robert M, Tattersall Martin H N
Medical Psychology Research Unit, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Cancer. 2005 May 1;103(9):1965-75. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21011.
It is challenging for clinicians to foster coping and allow hope when discussing prognosis and end-of-life (EOL) issues with terminally ill cancer patients and their caregivers. To the authors' knowledge, little research evidence is currently available to guide clinical practice.
The authors conducted focus groups and individual interviews with 19 patients with far advanced cancer and 24 caregivers from 3 palliative care (PC) services in Sydney, and 22 PC health professionals (HPs) from around Australia. The focus groups and individual interviews were audiotaped and fully transcribed. Additional focus groups or individual interviews were conducted until no additional topics were raised. The participants' narratives were analyzed using qualitative methodology.
All participant groups believed there were ways of fostering coping and nurturing hope when discussing prognosis and EOL issues. Themes identified from the transcripts regarding ways of helping patients with a limited life expectancy to cope were: 1) emphasize what can be done (namely: a) control of physical symptoms; b) emotional support, care, and dignity; and c) practical support), 2) explore realistic goals, and 3) discuss day-to-day living. Two additional themes were identified regarding ways of fostering hope: the balance between truth telling and nurturing hope, and the spectrum of hope. All these themes were raised by the patients, caregivers, and HPs. However, there were some differences of opinion within the three participant groups.
The results of the current study demonstrated that most participants believed there were ways of fostering coping and maintaining hope and that HPs have a role in facilitating this with terminally ill cancer patients and their caregivers.
对于临床医生而言,在与晚期癌症患者及其照护者讨论预后和临终(EOL)问题时,培养应对能力并给予希望是一项具有挑战性的任务。据作者所知,目前几乎没有研究证据可用于指导临床实践。
作者对来自悉尼3家姑息治疗(PC)服务机构的19例晚期癌症患者和24名照护者,以及来自澳大利亚各地的22名PC健康专业人员(HP)进行了焦点小组访谈和个人访谈。焦点小组访谈和个人访谈均进行了录音并全文转录。在没有新主题提出之前,持续进行额外的焦点小组访谈或个人访谈。使用定性方法对参与者的叙述进行分析。
所有参与组都认为在讨论预后和EOL问题时存在培养应对能力和滋养希望的方法。从转录本中确定的关于帮助预期寿命有限的患者应对的方法主题包括:1)强调可以做的事情(即:a)控制身体症状;b)情感支持、关怀和尊严;c)实际支持),2)探索现实目标,3)讨论日常生活。关于培养希望的方法还确定了另外两个主题:告知真相与滋养希望之间的平衡,以及希望的范围。所有这些主题均由患者、照护者和HP提出。然而,三个参与组之间存在一些意见分歧。
当前研究结果表明,大多数参与者认为存在培养应对能力和维持希望的方法,并且HP在促进晚期癌症患者及其照护者方面发挥着作用。