Lenzen M J, Boersma E, Bertrand M E, Maier W, Moris C, Piscione F, Sechtem U, Stahle E, Widimsky P, de Jaegere P, Scholte op Reimer W J M, Mercado N, Wijns W
Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Thoraxcenter, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Heart J. 2005 Jun;26(12):1169-79. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi238. Epub 2005 Mar 31.
The purpose of the Euro Heart Survey Programme of the European Society of Cardiology is to evaluate to which extent clinical practice endorses existing guidelines as well as to identify differences in population profiles, patient management, and outcome across Europe. The current survey focuses on the invasive diagnosis and treatment of patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD).
Between November 2001 and March 2002, 7769 consecutive patients undergoing invasive evaluation at 130 hospitals (31 countries) were screened for the presence of one or more coronary stenosis >50% in diameter. Patient demographics and comorbidity, clinical presentation, invasive parameters, treatment options, and procedural techniques were prospectively entered in an electronic database (550 variables+29 per diseased coronary segment). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were evaluated at 30 days and 1 year. Out of 5619 patients with angiographically proven coronary stenosis (72% of screened population), 53% presented with stable angina while ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was the indication for coronary angiography in 16% and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina in 30%. Only medical therapy was continued in 21%, whereas mechanical revascularization was performed in the remainder [percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in 58% and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 21%]. Patients referred for PCI were younger, were more active, had a lower risk profile, and had less comorbid conditions. CABG was performed mostly in patients with left main lesions (21%), two- (25%), or three-vessel disease (67%) with 4.1 diseased segments, on average. Single-vessel PCI was performed in 82% of patients with either single- (45%), two- (33%), or three-vessel disease (21%). Stents were used in 75% of attempted lesions, with a large variation between sites. Direct PCI for STEMI was performed in 410 cases, representing 7% of the entire workload in the participating catheterization laboratories. Time delay was within 90 min in 76% of direct PCI cases. In keeping with the recommendations of practice guidelines, the survey identified under-use of adjunctive medication (GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockers, statins, and angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors). Mortality rates at 30 days and 1 year were low in all subgroups. MACE primarily consisted of repeat PCI (12%).
The current Euro Heart Survey on coronary revascularization was performed in the era of bare metal stenting and provides a global European picture of the invasive approach to patients with CAD. These data will serve as a benchmark for the future evaluation of the impact of drug-eluting stents on the practice of interventional cardiology and bypass surgery.
欧洲心脏病学会开展的欧洲心脏调查项目旨在评估临床实践对现有指南的遵循程度,并确定欧洲各地在人群特征、患者管理及预后方面的差异。本次调查聚焦于确诊冠心病(CAD)患者的侵入性诊断和治疗。
2001年11月至2002年3月期间,对130家医院(31个国家)连续接受侵入性评估的7769例患者进行筛查,以确定是否存在一处或多处直径狭窄>50%的冠状动脉狭窄。前瞻性地将患者的人口统计学和合并症、临床表现、侵入性参数、治疗选择及操作技术录入电子数据库(550个变量 + 每个病变冠状动脉节段29个变量)。在30天和1年时评估主要不良心脏事件(MACE)。在5619例经血管造影证实有冠状动脉狭窄的患者中(占筛查人群的72%),53%表现为稳定型心绞痛,16%因ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)接受冠状动脉造影,30%因非ST段抬高型心肌梗死或不稳定型心绞痛接受冠状动脉造影。仅21%的患者继续接受药物治疗,其余患者接受了血运重建术[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)占58%,冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)占21%]。接受PCI治疗的患者更年轻、活动能力更强、风险特征更低且合并症更少。CABG主要用于左主干病变患者(21%)、双支(25%)或三支血管病变患者(67%),平均有4.1个病变节段。单支血管PCI用于单支(45%)、双支(33%)或三支血管病变患者的比例为82%。75%的尝试病变使用了支架,不同地点之间差异较大。410例患者接受了STEMI直接PCI治疗,占参与导管实验室全部工作量的7%。76%的直接PCI病例时间延迟在90分钟内。与实践指南的建议一致,该调查发现辅助药物(糖蛋白IIb/IIIa受体阻滞剂、他汀类药物和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂)使用不足。所有亚组在30天和1年时的死亡率均较低。MACE主要包括再次PCI(12%)。
本次欧洲冠心病血运重建调查是在裸金属支架时代进行的,提供了欧洲对CAD患者侵入性治疗方法的整体情况。这些数据将作为未来评估药物洗脱支架对介入心脏病学和搭桥手术实践影响的基准。