Suppr超能文献

取消匿名制会影响卵子捐赠者的招募吗?一项对既往捐赠者和受赠者的调查。

Will removal of anonymity influence the recruitment of egg donors? A survey of past donors and recipients.

作者信息

Craft Ian, Flyckt Sofia, Heeley Gosia, Layland Sarah, Thornhill Alan, Kelada Ehab

机构信息

London Fertility Centre, Cozens House, 112a Harley Street, London W1G 7JH, UK.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Mar;10(3):325-9. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61791-9.

Abstract

The UK Government has determined that children born from egg donation have the same right to know their biological parent as adopted children on reaching the age of 18. There is concern as to the effect of loss of anonymity on egg donor recruitment, since a wait of 1 or 2 years is not unusual for couples awaiting treatment. Some fertility programmes have introduced egg-sharing to circumvent these delays. However, egg-sharing may involve a sub-fertile donor and thus is likely to be less successful overall than egg donation. Recently, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority announced a consultation exercise to consider whether egg donors should receive increased payment or benefits in kind for their donation. To investigate whether or not removal of anonymity would have influenced or would influence their future participation, past egg donors and recipients have been surveyed. Questionnaires were sent to 867 former egg donors (n=504) and recipients (n=363), who were anonymous to each other. Response rates were similar between donors (32.7%) and recipients (39.1%). Of donors, 36.4% would not have participated had donor anonymity been waived, but 69.1% would donate anonymously again. Of recipients, 53.5% would not have proceeded had donor anonymity been waived, whereas 96.5% would receive anonymously donated eggs again. The results indicate that removal of anonymity for egg donors is likely to lead to a further restriction of an already unsatisfactory service to patients requiring donated eggs unless fundamental new initiatives are implemented.

摘要

英国政府已确定,通过卵子捐赠出生的儿童在年满18岁时,与领养儿童一样,享有了解其亲生父母的权利。人们担心匿名性的丧失对卵子捐赠者招募的影响,因为对于等待治疗的夫妇来说,等待1到2年并不罕见。一些生育计划引入了卵子共享来规避这些延误。然而,卵子共享可能涉及生育能力欠佳的捐赠者,因此总体上可能不如卵子捐赠成功。最近,人类受精与胚胎学管理局宣布了一项咨询活动,以考虑卵子捐赠者是否应因其捐赠获得更多报酬或实物福利。为了调查取消匿名性是否会影响或已经影响他们未来的参与情况,对过去的卵子捐赠者和接受者进行了调查。问卷被发送给867名以前的卵子捐赠者(n = 504)和接受者(n = 363),他们彼此匿名。捐赠者(32.7%)和接受者(39.1%)的回复率相似。在捐赠者中,如果捐赠者匿名性被放弃,36.4%的人不会参与,但69.1%的人会再次匿名捐赠。在接受者中,如果捐赠者匿名性被放弃,53.5%的人不会继续,而96.5%的人会再次接受匿名捐赠的卵子。结果表明,除非实施根本性的新举措,否则取消卵子捐赠者的匿名性可能会导致对需要捐赠卵子的患者的服务进一步受限,而目前该服务已经不尽人意。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验