Bennett Simon J, Barnes Graham R
Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M60 1QD, UK.
Exp Brain Res. 2005 May;163(2):198-203. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-2164-y. Epub 2005 Apr 9.
After the disappearance of a moving target and the loss of visual feedback regarding image motion, smooth pursuit eye velocity decays rapidly. If, however, there is an expectation the target will reappear further along its trajectory, there is a scaled recovery in eye velocity before target reappearance. The aim of this study was to examine whether the timing of the anticipatory recovery is influenced by the duration of transient target disappearance. We found that subjects (N=6) did not maintain eye velocity close to target velocity throughout the inter-stimulus interval (ISI). In general, after an initial reduction in eye velocity a significant increase was observed for most subjects before target reappearance, or a recovery that halted the decay. The timing of the recovery was not influenced by ISI even when this was predictable. There was, however, a significant effect of the initial visible ramp duration, indicating that the recovery was a consequence of the previous eye velocity trajectory and subsequent reacceleration. We suggest, therefore, that the recovery was timed to the moment of target disappearance rather than reappearance, and was the result of reactivation of a variable gain mechanism that acts on the visuomotor drive to ocular pursuit.
在移动目标消失且失去关于图像运动的视觉反馈后,平稳跟踪眼速度会迅速衰减。然而,如果预期目标会在其轨迹上进一步出现,那么在目标重新出现之前,眼速度会有一定程度的恢复。本研究的目的是检验预期恢复的时间是否受短暂目标消失持续时间的影响。我们发现,受试者(N = 6)在整个刺激间隔(ISI)期间并未使眼速度保持接近目标速度。总体而言,在眼速度最初降低之后,大多数受试者在目标重新出现之前观察到显著增加,或者是一种停止衰减的恢复。即使ISI是可预测的,恢复的时间也不受其影响。然而,初始可见斜坡持续时间有显著影响,表明恢复是先前眼速度轨迹和随后重新加速的结果。因此,我们认为恢复是根据目标消失的时刻而非重新出现的时刻进行定时的,并且是作用于视觉运动驱动以进行眼球跟踪的可变增益机制重新激活的结果。