Suppr超能文献

验证乳房的三维成像。

Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast.

作者信息

Losken Albert, Seify Hisham, Denson Donald D, Paredes Alfredo A, Carlson Grant W

机构信息

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2005 May;54(5):471-6; discussion 477-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000155278.87790.a1.

Abstract

The potential to extrapolate accurate data from 3-dimensional (3D) images of the breast is enormous and will greatly improve our ability to qualitatively determine differences in shape, size, and contour. The validity of these calculated measurements is important and needs to be determined before any meaningful data can be evaluated. PART I: Premastectomy 3D images (3dMD patient) were obtained on 19 breasts (14 patients). The volume of the mastectomy specimen was determined intraoperatively using water displacement. Two independent raters then calculated breast volumes using the 3D images and software, and these were compared with the intraoperative volume. Inter- and intrarater reliability was determined. Part II: Surface measurements (nipple to notch) were then evaluated on 20 breasts (10 patients) by comparing the 3D image determined distance to the known measurements. PART I: The average breast volume was 500 mL, compared with 489 mL for rater 1 and 490 mL for rater 2. The relative difference between the measured volume and the calculated volume for rater 1 and rater 2 was about -2%, with a standard deviation of +/- 13% to 16%. The coefficient of reproducibility for each reader was excellent, at 0.80 for rater 1 and 0.92 for rater 2. The level of agreement between the readers was also high at 0.975. Part II: The average nipple to notch measurement for each patient was 27.1 cm, compared the calculated average of 25.1 cm for rater 1 and 26.1 cm for rater 2. The mean relative difference between the measured and calculated distances for raters 1 and 2 was about -6%, with a standard deviation of +/- 6% to 7%. The level of agreement between readers was high, at 0.975. The ability to objectively determine breast volume and surface measurements using 3D imaging technology is now available with consistent and reproducible accuracy. Measurements are typically underestimated, with more variability when calculating volumes. Although inherent subjectivity will always exist when evaluating breast measurements, 3D technology provides invaluable information, particularly in the longitudinal evaluation of results.

摘要

从乳房的三维(3D)图像中推断准确数据的潜力巨大,这将极大地提高我们定性确定形状、大小和轮廓差异的能力。在评估任何有意义的数据之前,这些计算测量值的有效性很重要,需要加以确定。第一部分:对19个乳房(14名患者)获取了乳房切除术前的3D图像(3dMD患者)。术中通过水置换法确定乳房切除标本的体积。然后,两名独立的评估者使用3D图像和软件计算乳房体积,并将其与术中体积进行比较。确定了评估者之间和评估者内部的可靠性。第二部分:然后,通过比较3D图像确定的距离与已知测量值,对20个乳房(10名患者)进行了表面测量(乳头到切迹)。第一部分:平均乳房体积为500毫升,评估者1测得的体积为489毫升,评估者2测得的体积为490毫升。评估者1和评估者测得体积与计算体积之间的相对差异约为-2%,标准差为±13%至16%。每位读者的再现性系数都非常好,评估者1为0.80,评估者2为0.92。读者之间的一致性水平也很高,为0.975。第二部分:每位患者乳头到切迹的平均测量值为27.1厘米,评估者1计算的平均值为25.1厘米,评估者2计算的平均值为26.1厘米。评估者1和评估者2测量距离与计算距离之间的平均相对差异约为-6%,标准差为±6%至7%。读者之间的一致性水平很高,为0.975。现在可以使用3D成像技术以一致且可重复的准确性客观地确定乳房体积和表面测量值。测量值通常被低估,计算体积时变异性更大。尽管在评估乳房测量值时总是存在固有的主观性,但3D技术提供了非常有价值的信息,特别是在结果的纵向评估中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验