Suppr超能文献

患者费用分担对韩国门诊服务利用的影响。

The effects of patient cost sharing on ambulatory utilization in South Korea.

作者信息

Kim Jiyun, Ko Sukyoung, Yang Bongmin

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, 28 Yunkun-Dong, Chongro-Ku, Seoul 110-799, South Korea.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2005 Jun;72(3):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.09.002.

Abstract

This study focused mainly on the effects of patient cost sharing on the demand for physician service, especially in the low-income people. Patient cost sharing is one of the policies used extensively in the health care financing in Korea, which has been adopted to control the health care cost. It has raised the argument that cost sharing inhibits low-income patients' access to affordable medical care. Data from the National Health and Nutrition Survey conducted 1998 by the Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare was used for this analysis. Multiple regression was done with the dependent variable of the amount of ambulatory utilization and price elasticities are estimated. We obtained significant out-of-pocket price elasticities depending on patient income levels and types of care facilities in the range of -0.21 to -0.07, -0.20 to -0.10, respectively. We found out that low-income patients are more sensitive to cost sharing than high-income patients. Furthermore, we found out that the users of general hospitals are less sensitive to cost sharing than the users of clinics. These results shows that the cost sharing policy in Korea does not efficiently work. Patient cost sharing in Korea induces inequitable medical service utilization and also it does not decrease moral hazard in the sense that the higher cost-sharing sector is less sensitive to cost sharing.

摘要

本研究主要关注患者成本分担对医生服务需求的影响,尤其是对低收入人群的影响。患者成本分担是韩国医疗保健融资中广泛使用的政策之一,该政策旨在控制医疗保健成本。这引发了一种观点,即成本分担会抑制低收入患者获得负担得起的医疗服务。本分析使用了韩国卫生和福利部1998年进行的国民健康与营养调查的数据。以门诊利用率为因变量进行多元回归,并估计价格弹性。根据患者收入水平和护理设施类型,我们分别在-0.21至-0.07、-0.20至-0.10的范围内获得了显著的自付价格弹性。我们发现低收入患者比高收入患者对成本分担更敏感。此外,我们发现综合医院的使用者比诊所的使用者对成本分担更不敏感。这些结果表明,韩国的成本分担政策效果不佳。韩国的患者成本分担导致了医疗服务利用的不公平,而且从更高成本分担部门对成本分担更不敏感的意义上来说,它并没有降低道德风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验