Suppr超能文献

罗非昔布、塞来昔布及其他非甾体抗炎药使用者发生心肌梗死住院的风险:一项基于人群的病例对照研究。

Risk of hospitalization for myocardial infarction among users of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and other NSAIDs: a population-based case-control study.

作者信息

Johnsen Søren P, Larsson Heidi, Tarone Robert E, McLaughlin Joseph K, Nørgård Bente, Friis Søren, Sørensen Henrik T

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2005 May 9;165(9):978-84. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.9.978.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It remains uncertain if the excess cardiovascular risk of rofecoxib and celecoxib reported in clinical trials is present in routine practice and whether the use of other nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) also carries an increased cardiovascular risk. We performed a population-based case-control study to examine the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) among users of various categories of nonaspirin NSAIDs.

METHODS

Using data from hospital discharge registries in the counties of North Jutland, Viborg, and Aarhus, Denmark, and the Danish Civil Registration System, we identified 10,280 cases of first-time hospitalization for MI and 102,797 sex- and age-matched non-MI population controls. All prescriptions for nonaspirin NSAIDs filled before the date of admission for MI were identified using population-based prescription databases. Relative risk estimates for MI were adjusted for a history of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic bronchitis or emphysema, alcoholism, liver cirrhosis, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and the use of high-dose aspirin, platelet inhibitors, insulin or oral hypoglycemic drugs, antihypertensive drugs, lipid-lowering drugs, oral anticoagulants, nitrates, penicillamine, gold, oral glucocorticoids, and hormone therapy before the date of admission for MI.

RESULTS

Current users of rofecoxib had an elevated risk estimate for hospitalization for MI compared with nonusers of any category of nonaspirin NSAIDs (adjusted relative risk [ARR], 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47-2.21). Increased risk estimates were also found among current users of celecoxib (ARR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.97-1.62), other cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors (ARR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.09-1.93), naproxen (ARR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.99-2.29), and other conventional nonaspirin NSAIDs (ARR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.52-1.85). The highest ARRs were found among new users of all examined drug categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Current and new users of all classes of nonaspirin NSAIDs had elevated relative risk estimates for MI. Although the increased risk estimates may partly reflect unmeasured bias, they indicate the need for further examination of the cardiovascular safety of all nonaspirin NSAIDs.

摘要

背景

临床试验中所报告的罗非昔布和塞来昔布超出正常水平的心血管风险在常规医疗实践中是否存在,以及使用其他非阿司匹林非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)是否也会增加心血管风险,目前仍不确定。我们开展了一项基于人群的病例对照研究,以调查各类非阿司匹林NSAIDs使用者发生心肌梗死(MI)的风险。

方法

利用丹麦北日德兰郡、维堡郡和奥胡斯郡医院出院登记处的数据以及丹麦民事登记系统,我们确定了10280例首次因MI住院的病例以及102797例性别和年龄匹配的非MI人群对照。使用基于人群的处方数据库确定MI入院日期之前开具的所有非阿司匹林NSAIDs处方。针对MI的相对风险估计值根据心血管疾病、高血压、糖尿病、慢性支气管炎或肺气肿、酗酒、肝硬化、上消化道出血、类风湿性关节炎、系统性红斑狼疮病史以及MI入院日期之前使用高剂量阿司匹林、血小板抑制剂、胰岛素或口服降糖药、抗高血压药、降脂药、口服抗凝剂、硝酸盐、青霉胺、金制剂、口服糖皮质激素和激素疗法进行了调整。

结果

与未使用任何类别非阿司匹林NSAIDs的人群相比,当前使用罗非昔布的人群MI住院风险估计值升高(调整后相对风险[ARR],1.80;95%置信区间[CI],1.47 - 2.21)。在当前使用塞来昔布的人群(ARR,1.25;95%CI,0.97 - 1.62)、其他环氧化酶-2选择性抑制剂使用者(ARR,1.45;95%CI,1.09 - 1.93)、萘普生使用者(ARR,1.50;95%CI,0.99 - 2.29)以及其他传统非阿司匹林NSAIDs使用者(ARR,1.68;95%CI,1.52 - 1.85)中也发现风险估计值升高。在所有研究药物类别的新使用者中观察到最高的ARR。

结论

所有类别非阿司匹林NSAIDs的当前使用者和新使用者MI的相对风险估计值均升高。尽管风险估计值升高可能部分反映了未测量的偏倚,但这表明有必要进一步研究所有非阿司匹林NSAIDs的心血管安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验