Wright K W, Min B M, Park C
Division of Ophthalmology, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, CA 90027.
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1992 Mar-Apr;29(2):92-7; discussion 98-9. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19920301-08.
We compared surgical results of superior oblique tenotomy to the superior oblique silicone expander for the treatment of superior oblique overaction and Brown syndrome. Of 24 patients with bilateral superior oblique overaction, 13 underwent tenotomy and 11 had the silicone expander procedure. Reduction of A-pattern to within 10 prism diopters was achieved in 12/13 (92.3%) tenotomy patients and in 10/11 (90.9%) patients undergoing silicone expander (P greater than .05). Correction of superior oblique overaction on versions to within +/- 1 dysfunction was achieved in 22/26 (84.6%) of the tenotomies, and 21/22 (95.5%) silicone expander procedures (P greater than .05). Zero superior oblique dysfunction was found after 14/26 (53.8%) tenotomy procedures versus 18/22 (81.8%) silicone expander operations (P = .041). Superior oblique paresis occurred postoperatively in 4/13 (30.8%) tenotomy patients, whereas none of the 11 patients in the silicone expander group had superior oblique paresis (P = .044). Six patients who underwent superior oblique tenotomy for superior oblique overaction had preoperative stereopsis; following surgery, only two maintained the same level of stereopsis, and three patients totally lost all stereo acuity. All patients in the silicone expander group either maintained or had improved stereo acuity postoperatively. Seven patients with true Brown syndrome were operated on: three underwent the silicone expander procedure and four had a superior oblique tenotomy with an ipsilateral inferior oblique recession. The combination of superior oblique tenotomy with simultaneous ipsilateral inferior oblique recession resulted in an undercorrection in two of the four patients, whereas all three patients in the silicone expander group showed excellent ocular motility postoperatively, with two having normal versions and one a -1 residual limitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们比较了上斜肌切断术与上斜肌硅胶扩张术治疗上斜肌亢进和布朗综合征的手术效果。在24例双侧上斜肌亢进患者中,13例行上斜肌切断术,11例行硅胶扩张术。上斜肌切断术组13例中有12例(92.3%)、硅胶扩张术组11例中有10例(90.9%)将A征减少至10棱镜度以内(P>0.05)。上斜肌切断术组26例中有22例(84.6%)、硅胶扩张术组22例中有21例(95.5%)在眼位运动时将上斜肌亢进矫正至±1级功能障碍以内(P>0.05)。上斜肌切断术组26例中有14例(53.8%)术后上斜肌功能障碍为零,而硅胶扩张术组22例中有18例(81.8%)如此(P = 0.041)。上斜肌切断术组13例中有4例(30.8%)术后出现上斜肌麻痹,而硅胶扩张术组11例中无一例出现上斜肌麻痹(P = 0.044)。6例因上斜肌亢进而行上斜肌切断术的患者术前有立体视;术后,仅2例维持相同的立体视水平,3例完全丧失所有立体视锐度。硅胶扩张术组所有患者术后立体视锐度均维持或提高。7例真性布朗综合征患者接受了手术:3例行硅胶扩张术,4例行上斜肌切断术并同期行同侧下斜肌后徙术。上斜肌切断术联合同期同侧下斜肌后徙术的4例患者中有2例矫正不足,而硅胶扩张术组的3例患者术后眼球运动均良好,2例眼位正常,1例有-1级残余受限。(摘要截短至250词)