Sellen Joselyn L, Oaksford Mike, Gray Nicola S
Centre for Psychology, School of Health and Social Sciences, University of Wales Institute Cardiff (UWIC), Llandaff Campus, Western Avenue, Cardiff, CF5 2YB, UK.
Schizophr Bull. 2005 Jan;31(1):105-16. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbi012. Epub 2005 Feb 16.
This study investigated the role of reasoning biases in delusion formation and maintenance. Reasoning judgments have been shown to be influenced by prior knowledge, beliefs, and experience--that is, information stored in semantic memory. It was hypothesized that high schizotypes would exhibit a "jump to conclusions" style of reasoning as a result of not using implicit information concerned with cause-effect relationships. Research into human reasoning has traditionally adopted logic as a normative framework to assess human reasoning. Conditional inference tasks are direct tests of logical performance, and we employed an established design that depends upon the reasoner's ability to access and use implicit information. In an effort to negate some of the difficulties of research with schizophrenia patients, schizotypy measures were employed in a normal population. The results confirmed that high scorers on one dimension of schizotypy (Impulsive Nonconformity) failed to take account of the number of counterexamples that characterized the cause-effect conditional statement. These observations supported previous research demonstrating a jump to conclusions style of reasoning that it has been suggested plays a role in the formation and maintenance of delusions. Furthermore, these findings suggest a possible link between semantic memory and reasoning biases.
本研究调查了推理偏差在妄想形成和维持中的作用。推理判断已被证明会受到先验知识、信念和经验(即存储在语义记忆中的信息)的影响。研究假设,由于不使用与因果关系相关的隐性信息,高精神分裂型人格者会表现出“急于下结论”的推理风格。传统上,对人类推理的研究采用逻辑作为评估人类推理的规范框架。条件推理任务是对逻辑表现的直接测试,我们采用了一种既定的设计,该设计依赖于推理者获取和使用隐性信息的能力。为了消除对精神分裂症患者进行研究的一些困难,我们在正常人群中采用了精神分裂型人格测量方法。结果证实,在精神分裂型人格的一个维度(冲动非从众性)上得分高的人没有考虑到构成因果条件陈述特征的反例数量。这些观察结果支持了先前的研究,该研究表明存在一种急于下结论的推理风格,有人认为这种风格在妄想的形成和维持中起作用。此外,这些发现表明语义记忆和推理偏差之间可能存在联系。