Suppr超能文献

护理博士项目评估——一项综述及后续跟进策略

Evaluation of doctoral nursing programs - a review and a strategy for follow up.

作者信息

Kjellgren Karin I, Welin Catharina, Danielson Ella

机构信息

Institute of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Caring Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Sweden.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2005 May;25(4):316-25. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.02.002. Epub 2005 Mar 29.

Abstract

Enhancing and assuring the quality of doctoral nursing programs is currently of major concern to promote growth in quality and quantity of research in nursing. The aims of the paper were to review the literature about evaluation of higher education with focus on doctoral programs in nursing, and to present a strategy to evaluate a doctoral nursing program. A search of literature in relevant databases was done using the keywords doctoral program, evaluation, nursing, program evaluation and higher education. From the review it is concluded that more systematic evaluations are necessary to guide the development of quality in nursing. Attention must be given to the curricula, competence in the faculty, the research activity and to the students' involvement in courses and research. Therefore, a strategy for evaluation should be ongoing, flexible, systematic and comprehensive. It should involve students, graduates, employers and faculty members in evaluation, include process and outcome data and give possibility for comparison to internal and external standards. The strategy developed aims to facilitate ongoing and future improvement of the doctoral nursing program. This process is dependent on a methodological pluralism of evaluation to detect what is of most weight for growth in the process of research and education.

摘要

提高并确保护理学博士项目的质量是当前促进护理研究在质量和数量上增长的主要关注点。本文的目的是回顾关于高等教育评估的文献,重点关注护理学博士项目,并提出一种评估护理学博士项目的策略。使用关键词“博士项目”“评估”“护理”“项目评估”和“高等教育”在相关数据库中进行文献检索。从综述中得出结论,需要更系统的评估来指导护理质量的提升。必须关注课程设置、教师能力、研究活动以及学生参与课程和研究的情况。因此,评估策略应该是持续的、灵活的、系统的和全面的。它应该让学生、毕业生、雇主和教师参与评估,包括过程和结果数据,并提供与内部和外部标准进行比较的可能性。所制定的策略旨在促进护理学博士项目的持续改进和未来发展。这个过程依赖于评估方法的多元化,以发现对研究和教育过程中增长最为重要的因素。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of doctoral nursing programs - a review and a strategy for follow up.
Nurse Educ Today. 2005 May;25(4):316-25. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.02.002. Epub 2005 Mar 29.
2
Quality of faculty, students, curriculum and resources for nursing doctoral education in Korea: a focus group study.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):295-306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
3
Program evaluation: an ongoing systematic process.
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2004 Jul-Aug;25(4):176-9.
4
A rubric for improving the quality of online courses.
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2008;5:Article 34. doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.1648. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
8
Current strengths and limitations of doctoral education in nursing: are we prepared for the future?
J Prof Nurs. 2000 Jul-Aug;16(4):191-200. doi: 10.1053/jpnu.2000.7830.
10
Primary trait analysis: student, course, and program assessment.
Nurse Educ. 2009 May-Jun;34(3):114-7. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e31819fca9d.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验