Di Eusanio Marco, Schepens Marc A A M, Morshuis Wim J, Di Bartolomeo Roberto, Pacini Davide, Di Eusanio Giuseppe, Kazui Teruhisa, Washiyama Naoki
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Santa Maria Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Ital Heart J. 2005 Apr;6(4):335-40.
The aim of this study was to evaluate early results and to determine predictive risk factors associated with an adverse outcome in elderly patients after acute type A aortic dissection repair using antegrade selective cerebral perfusion (ASCP). Adverse outcome was defined as the occurrence of death or permanent neurologic dysfunction.
From October 1995 to March 2002, 178 patients (group A < 75 years, n = 156, 87.6%; group B > 75 years, n = 22, 12.4%) underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection using ASCP and moderate hypothermia. An ascending aorta/hemiarch replacement was performed in 128/178 (71.9%) patients (group A 71.2%, group B 77.3%, p = NS), an ascending aorta and arch replacement in 50/178 (28.1%) patients (group A 28.8%, group B 22.7%, p = NS). Associated procedures were performed in 55/178 (20.9%) patients (group A 31.4%, group B 27.3%, p = NS), the arch vessels were reimplanted using the separated graft technique in 32/50 (64.0%) patients (group A 62.2%, group B 80.0%, p = NS). The mean ASCP time was 59 +/- 27 min.
The overall adverse outcome rate was 20.8% (group A 21.2%, group B 18.2%, p = NS). The transient neurologic dysfunction rate was 9.5% (group A 9.5%, group B 5.6%, p = NS). A logistic regression analysis revealed cardiopulmonary bypass time (p = 0.045, odds ratio 1.03/min) to be the only independent predictor of adverse outcome in group A.
During type A aortic dissection repair the implementation of ASCP resulted in an acceptable hospital mortality and neurologic outcome. If ASCP is used, the risk of hospital mortality and postoperative morbidity is similar in patients younger and older than 75 years. Duration of cardiopulmonary bypass still remains an important risk factor for hospital mortality and neurologic outcome in elderly patients.
本研究旨在评估早期结果,并确定老年患者在采用顺行选择性脑灌注(ASCP)进行急性A型主动脉夹层修复术后不良结局的预测风险因素。不良结局定义为死亡或永久性神经功能障碍的发生。
1995年10月至2002年3月,178例患者(A组年龄<75岁,n = 156,87.6%;B组年龄>75岁,n = 22,12.4%)采用ASCP和中度低温进行急性A型主动脉夹层手术。128/178例(71.9%)患者进行了升主动脉/半弓置换(A组71.2%,B组77.3%,p = 无显著差异),50/178例(28.1%)患者进行了升主动脉和主动脉弓置换(A组28.8%,B组22.7%,p = 无显著差异)。55/178例(20.9%)患者进行了相关手术(A组31.4%,B组27.3%,p = 无显著差异),32/50例(64.0%)患者采用分离移植物技术进行了弓血管再植(A组62.2%,B组80.0%,p = 无显著差异)。平均ASCP时间为59±27分钟。
总体不良结局发生率为20.8%(A组21.2%,B组18.2%,p = 无显著差异)。短暂性神经功能障碍发生率为9.5%(A组9.5%,B组5.6%,p = 无显著差异)。逻辑回归分析显示,体外循环时间(p = 0.045,比值比1.03/分钟)是A组不良结局的唯一独立预测因素。
在A型主动脉夹层修复过程中,ASCP的实施导致了可接受的医院死亡率和神经学结局。如果使用ASCP,75岁及以上和以下患者的医院死亡率和术后发病率风险相似。体外循环时间仍然是老年患者医院死亡率和神经学结局的重要风险因素。