Li Y, Tokura H, Guo Y P, Wong A S W, Wong T, Chung J, Newton E
Institute of Textiles and Clothing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2005 Jul;78(6):501-9. doi: 10.1007/s00420-004-0584-4. Epub 2005 May 26.
The study was aimed at investigating the effects of wearing N95 and surgical facemasks with and without nano-functional treatments on thermophysiological responses and the subjective perception of discomfort.
Five healthy male and five healthy female participants performed intermittent exercise on a treadmill while wearing the protective facemasks in a climate chamber controlled at an air temperature of 25 degrees C and a relative humidity of 70%. Four types of facemasks, including N95 (3M 8210) and surgical facemasks, which were treated with nano-functional materials, were used in the study.
(1) The subjects had significantly lower average heart rates when wearing nano-treated and untreated surgical facemasks than when wearing nano-treated and untreated N95 facemasks. (2) The outer surface temperature of both surgical facemasks was significantly higher than that of both N95 facemasks. On the other hand, the microclimate and skin temperatures inside the facemask were significantly lower than those in both N95 facemasks. (3) Both surgical facemasks had significantly higher absolute humidity outside the surface than both N95 facemasks. The absolute humidity inside the surgical facemask was significantly lower than that inside both N95 facemasks. (4) Both surgical facemasks were rated significantly lower for perception of humidity, heat, breath resistance and overall discomfort than both N95 facemasks. The ratings for other sensations, including feeling unfit, tight, itchy, fatigued, odorous and salty, that were obtained while the subjects were wearing the surgical facemasks were significantly lower than when the subjects were wearing the N95 facemasks. (5) Subjective preference for the nano-treated surgical facemasks was the highest. There was significant differences in preference between the nano-treated and untreated surgical facemasks and between the surgical and N95 facemasks.
We discuss how N95 and surgical facemasks induce significantly different temperature and humidity in the microclimates of the facemasks, which have profound influences on heart rate and thermal stress and subjective perception of discomfort.
本研究旨在调查佩戴有无纳米功能处理的N95口罩和医用外科口罩对热生理反应及不适主观感受的影响。
五名健康男性和五名健康女性参与者在温度为25摄氏度、相对湿度为70%的气候舱内,戴着防护口罩在跑步机上进行间歇性运动。本研究使用了四种类型的口罩,包括N95(3M 8210)口罩和经过纳米功能材料处理的医用外科口罩。
(1)与佩戴经纳米处理和未经纳米处理的N95口罩相比,受试者佩戴经纳米处理和未经纳米处理的医用外科口罩时的平均心率显著更低。(2)两种医用外科口罩的外表面温度均显著高于两种N95口罩。另一方面,口罩内部的微气候温度和皮肤温度显著低于两种N95口罩。(3)两种医用外科口罩表面外侧的绝对湿度均显著高于两种N95口罩。医用外科口罩内部的绝对湿度显著低于两种N95口罩内部。(4)两种医用外科口罩在湿度、热量、呼吸阻力和总体不适的感知评分上均显著低于两种N95口罩。受试者佩戴医用外科口罩时获得的其他感觉评分,包括感觉不舒适、紧绷、瘙痒、疲劳、有异味和咸味,均显著低于佩戴N95口罩时。(5)对经纳米处理的医用外科口罩的主观偏好最高。经纳米处理和未经纳米处理的医用外科口罩之间以及医用外科口罩和N95口罩之间的偏好存在显著差异。
我们讨论了N95口罩和医用外科口罩如何在口罩微气候中引起显著不同的温度和湿度,这对心率、热应激和不适主观感受有深远影响。