Szanton Sarah L, Gill Jessica M, Allen Jerilyn K
Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Biol Res Nurs. 2005 Jul;7(1):7-15. doi: 10.1177/1099800405278216.
Although research on health disparities has been prioritized by the National Institutes of Health, the Institute of Medicine, and Healthy People 2010, little has been published that examines the biology underlying health disparities. Allostatic load is a multisystem construct theorized to quantify stress-induced biological risk. Differences in allostatic load may reflect differences in stress exposure and thus provide a mechanistic link to understanding health disparities. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the construct of allostatic load and the published studies that employ it in an effort to understand whether the construct can be useful in quantifying health disparities. The published literature demonstrates that allostatic load is elevated in those of low socioeconomic status (SES) as compared to those of high SES. The reviewed articles vary in the justification for inclusion of variables. Recommendations for future research are made in the contexts of measurement, methodology, and racial composition of participants.
尽管美国国立卫生研究院、医学研究所及《健康人民2010》都将健康差异研究列为优先事项,但探讨健康差异背后生物学机制的相关文献却鲜有发表。应激负荷是一种多系统概念,旨在量化应激诱导的生物学风险。应激负荷的差异可能反映出应激暴露的不同,从而为理解健康差异提供一个机制性联系。本系统综述的目的是研究应激负荷这一概念以及运用该概念的已发表研究,以了解该概念是否有助于量化健康差异。已发表的文献表明,与高社会经济地位(SES)者相比,低SES者的应激负荷更高。纳入综述的文章在纳入变量的理由方面各不相同。本文在测量、方法及参与者种族构成等方面对未来研究提出了建议。