Klistorner A I, Graham S L, Grigg J, Balachandran C
Save Sight Institute, Sydney Eye Hospital, Macquarie Street, PO Box 1614, Sydney 2001, Australia.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jun;89(6):739-44. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.053223.
To examine the ability of the multifocal pattern visual evoked potential (mVEP) to detect field loss in neurological lesions affecting the visual pathway from the chiasm to the cortex.
The mVEPs recorded in the clinic were retrospectively reviewed for any cases involving central neurological lesions. Recordings had been performed with the AccuMap V1.3 objective perimeter, which used an array of four bipolar occipital electrodes to provide four differently oriented channels for simultaneous recording. 19 patients with hemianopias were identified. Of these there were 10 homonymous hemianopias with hemifield type loss, two bitemporal hemianopias, and seven homonymous hemianopias with quadrantanopic distribution. A comparison with subjective field results and CT/MRI findings was done to determine the relation between the two methods of visual field mapping and any relation with the anatomical location of the lesion and the mVEP results.
In all hemianopic type cases (12) the defect was demonstrated on the mVEP and showed good correspondence in location of the scotoma (nine homonymous and two bitemporal). The topographic distribution was similar but not identical to subjective testing. Of the seven quadrantanopic type hemianopias, only four were found to have corresponding mVEP losses in the same areas. In the three cases where the mVEP was normal, the type of quadrantanopia had features consistent with an extra-striate lesion being very congruous, complete, and respecting the horizontal meridian.
The mVEP can detect field loss from cortical lesions, but not in some cases of homonymous quadrantanopia, where the lesion may have been in the extra-striate cortex. This supports the concept that the mVEP is generated in V1 striate cortex and that it may be able to distinguish striate from extra-striate lesions. It implies caution should be used when interpreting "functional" loss using the mVEP if the visual field pattern is quadrantic.
研究多焦点图形视觉诱发电位(mVEP)检测影响从视交叉至皮质的视觉通路的神经病变中视野缺损的能力。
对临床记录的mVEP进行回顾性分析,以查找涉及中枢神经病变的所有病例。记录采用AccuMap V1.3客观视野计进行,该视野计使用四个双极枕电极阵列提供四个不同方向的通道用于同步记录。共识别出19例偏盲患者。其中,10例为同向偏盲伴半视野类型缺损,2例为双颞侧偏盲,7例为同向偏盲伴象限盲分布。将其与主观视野结果及CT/MRI检查结果进行比较,以确定两种视野测绘方法之间的关系,以及与病变解剖位置和mVEP结果的任何关系。
在所有偏盲类型病例(12例)中,mVEP均显示出缺损,且暗点位置对应良好(9例同向偏盲和2例双颞侧偏盲)。地形图分布与主观检测相似但不完全相同。在7例象限盲类型的偏盲中,仅4例在相同区域发现有相应的mVEP缺损。在mVEP正常的3例病例中,象限盲类型具有与纹外病变一致的特征,即非常一致、完全且符合水平子午线。
mVEP能够检测皮质病变导致的视野缺损,但在某些同向象限盲病例中无法检测到,这些病例的病变可能位于纹外皮质。这支持了mVEP由V1纹状皮质产生的概念,并且它可能能够区分纹状皮质与纹外皮质病变。这意味着当视野模式为象限性时,在使用mVEP解释“功能性”缺损时应谨慎。