Kupelian Patrick, Thames Howard, Levy Larry, Horwitz Eric, Martinez Alvaro, Michalski Jeff, Pisansky Thomas, Sandler Howard, Shipley William, Zelefsky Michael, Zietman Anthony, Kuban Deborah
Department of Radiation Oncology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Orlando, Orlando, FL 32806, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Nov 1;63(3):795-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.029. Epub 2005 May 31.
To study the use of the year of therapy as an independent predictor of outcomes, serving as a proxy for time-related changes in therapy and tumor factors in the treatment of prostate cancer. Accounting for these changes would facilitate the retrospective comparison of outcomes for patients treated in different periods.
Nine institutions combined data on 4,537 patients with Stages T1 and T2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate who had a pretherapy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and biopsy Gleason score, and who had received > or = 60 Gy external beam radiotherapy without neoadjuvant androgen deprivation or planned adjuvant androgen deprivation. All patients were treated between 1986 and 1995. Two groups were defined: those treated before 1993 (Yr < or = 92) vs. 1993 and after (Yr > or = 93). Patients treated before 1993 had their follow-up truncated to make the follow-up time similar to that for patients treated in 1993 and after. Therefore, the median follow-up time was 6.0 years for both groups (Yr < or = 92 and Yr > or = 93). Two separate biochemical failure endpoints were used. Definition A consisted of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology Oncology endpoint (three PSA rises backdated, local failure, distant failure, or hormonal therapy). Definition B consisted of PSA level greater than the current nadir plus two, local failure, distant failure, or hormonal therapy administered. Multivariate analyses for factors affecting PSA disease-free survival (PSA-DFS) rates using both endpoints were performed for all cases using the following variables: T stage (T1b, T1c, T2a vs. T2b, T2c), pretreatment PSA (continuous variable), biopsy Gleason score (continuous variable), radiation dose (continuous variable), and year of treatment (continuous variable). The year variable (defined as the current year minus 1960) ranged from 26 to 35. To evaluate the effect of radiation dose, the multivariate analyses were repeated with the 3,897 cases who had received < 72 Gy using the same variables except for radiation dose.
For all 4,537 patients, the 5- and 8-year PSA-DFS estimate using definition A (ASTRO consensus definition) was 60% and 55%, respectively. The 8-year PSA-DFS estimate for Yr < 93 vs. Yr > or = 93 was 52% vs. 57%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the subgroup of patients receiving < 72 Gy, the 8-year PSA-DFS estimate for Yr < 93 vs. Yr > or = 93 was 52% and 55%, respectively (p = 0.004). The differences in PSA-DFS rates in the different subgroups were similar when definition B was used. The multivariate analyses for all 4,537 cases with either PSA-DFS definition revealed T stage (p < 0.001), pretherapy PSA level (p < 0.001), Gleason score (p < 0.001), radiation dose (p < 0.001), and year of treatment (p < 0.001) to be independent predictors of outcomes. The multivariate analyses restricted to the 3,897 cases receiving < 72 Gy still revealed year of treatment to be an independent predictor of outcomes (p < 0.001), in addition to T stage (p < 0.001), pretherapy PSA level (p < 0.001), and Gleason score (p < 0.001).
Independent of tumor stage, radiation dose, failure definition, and follow-up parameters, the year in which RT was performed was an independent predictor of outcomes. These findings indicate a more favorable presentation of localized prostate cancer in current years that is not necessarily reflected in the patients' PSA levels or Gleason scores. This phenomenon is probably related to a combination of factors, such as screening, increased patient awareness leading to earlier biopsies and earlier diagnosis, more aggressive pretherapy staging, and unrecognized improvements in therapy, but perhaps also to changing tumor biology. Outcomes predictions should be based on contemporaneous series. Alternatively, the year of therapy could be incorporated as a variable in outcomes analyses of localized prostate cancer patients treated in different periods within the PSA era.
研究治疗年份作为结果独立预测指标的应用,以此代表前列腺癌治疗中与时间相关的治疗及肿瘤因素变化。考虑这些变化将有助于对不同时期接受治疗的患者的结果进行回顾性比较。
九个机构汇总了4537例T1和T2期前列腺腺癌患者的数据,这些患者有治疗前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平及活检Gleason评分,且接受了≥60 Gy的外照射放疗,未进行新辅助雄激素剥夺或计划中的辅助雄激素剥夺。所有患者均在1986年至1995年期间接受治疗。定义了两组:1993年之前治疗的患者(年份≤92)与1993年及之后治疗的患者(年份≥93)。对1993年之前治疗的患者进行截尾随访,使其随访时间与1993年及之后治疗的患者相似。因此,两组的中位随访时间均为6.0年(年份≤92和年份≥93)。使用了两个独立的生化失败终点。定义A包括美国放射肿瘤学会治疗终点(三次回溯性PSA升高、局部失败、远处失败或激素治疗)。定义B包括PSA水平高于当前最低点加2、局部失败、远处失败或给予激素治疗。使用以下变量对所有病例进行多因素分析,以确定影响PSA无病生存(PSA-DFS)率的因素:T分期(T1b、T1c、T2a与T2b、T2c)、治疗前PSA(连续变量)、活检Gleason评分(连续变量)、放射剂量(连续变量)以及治疗年份(连续变量)。年份变量(定义为当前年份减去1960)范围为26至35。为评估放射剂量的影响,对接受<72 Gy的3897例病例使用相同变量(放射剂量除外)重复进行多因素分析。
对于所有4537例患者,使用定义A(ASTRO共识定义)的5年和8年PSA-DFS估计值分别为60%和55%。年份<93与年份≥93相比,8年PSA-DFS估计值分别为52%和57%(p<0.001)。在接受<72 Gy的患者亚组中,年份<93与年份≥93相比,8年PSA-DFS估计值分别为52%和55%(p = 0.004)。使用定义B时,不同亚组中PSA-DFS率的差异相似。对所有4537例病例使用任一PSA-DFS定义进行的多因素分析显示,T分期(p<0.001)、治疗前PSA水平(p<0.001)、Gleason评分(p<0.001)、放射剂量(p<0.001)以及治疗年份(p<0.001)是结果的独立预测因素。对接受<72 Gy的3897例病例进行的多因素分析仍然显示,除T分期(p<0.001)、治疗前PSA水平(p<0.001)和Gleason评分(p<0.001)外,治疗年份也是结果的独立预测因素(p<0.001)。
独立于肿瘤分期、放射剂量、失败定义和随访参数,进行放疗的年份是结果的独立预测因素。这些发现表明近年来局限性前列腺癌的表现更有利,这不一定反映在患者的PSA水平或Gleason评分中。这种现象可能与多种因素的综合作用有关,如筛查、患者意识提高导致更早活检和更早诊断、更积极的治疗前分期以及未被认识到的治疗改善,但也可能与肿瘤生物学变化有关。结果预测应基于同期系列。或者,治疗年份可作为一个变量纳入PSA时代不同时期接受治疗的局限性前列腺癌患者的结果分析中。