Atack John R
Merck Sharp & Dohme Research Laboratories, Neuroscience Research Centre, Terlings Park, Eastwick Road, Harlow, Essex CM20 2QR, UK.
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2005 May;14(5):601-18. doi: 10.1517/13543784.14.5.601.
Non-selective benzodiazepine (BZ) binding-site full agonists, exemplified by diazepam, act by enhancing the inhibitory effects of GABA at GABA(A) receptors containing either an alpha1, -2, -3 or -5 subunit. However, despite their proven clinical anxiolytic efficacy, such compounds possess a relatively narrow window between doses that produce anxiolysis and those that cause sedation, and are also associated with physical dependence and a potential for abuse. In the late 1980s and early 1990s a number of non-selective partial agonists, exemplified by bretazenil, pazinaclone and abecarnil, were described. Their reduced intrinsic efficacy relative to full agonists such as diazepam resulted in an improved preclinical pharmacological profile in that there was a large window between anxiolytic and sedative doses and their dependence and abuse liabilities were much lower. Unfortunately, these compounds failed, for a variety of reasons, to translate into clinical benefit, and as the public perception of BZs deteriorated interest in the area waned. However, the advent of molecular genetic and pharmacological approaches has begun to delineate which GABA(A) receptor subtypes are associated with the various pharmacological effects of the non-selective BZs. More specifically, the alpha2- and/or alpha3-containing GABA(A) receptors play a role in anxiety whereas the alpha1 subtype is involved in sedation, raising the possibility of a compound that selectively modulates alpha2- and/or alpha3-containing receptors but does not affect alpha1-containing receptors would be a non-sedating anxiolytic. In order to achieve selectivity for the alpha2/alpha3 subtypes relative to alpha1, two approaches may be used; selective affinity or selective efficacy. Selective affinity relies on a compound binding with higher affinity to the alpha2/alpha3 compared with alpha1 subtypes, but to date no such compounds have been described. On the other hand, subtype-selective efficacy relies on a compound binding to all subtypes but having different efficacies at various subtypes (relative selective efficacy, for example SL654198 or pagoclone) or having efficacy at some subtypes but none at others (absolute selective efficacy; for example, L-838417). The status of these and other BZ site compounds with claimed, but often not explicitly stated, GABA(A) subtype selectivity (such as ELB-139 and ocinaplon) will be reviewed in relation to their development as non-sedating anxiolytics for the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder.
以地西泮为代表的非选择性苯二氮䓬(BZ)结合位点完全激动剂,通过增强GABA对含有α1、-2、-3或-5亚基的GABA(A)受体的抑制作用来发挥作用。然而,尽管这类化合物已被证实具有临床抗焦虑疗效,但在产生抗焦虑作用的剂量与导致镇静作用的剂量之间,其安全范围相对较窄,并且还与身体依赖性和滥用可能性相关。在20世纪80年代末和90年代初,人们描述了一些非选择性部分激动剂,以布立西坦、帕齐克隆和阿贝卡尼为代表。与地西泮等完全激动剂相比,它们内在活性降低,这使得临床前药理学特征得到改善,即抗焦虑剂量和镇静剂量之间的安全范围较大,且其依赖性和滥用倾向要低得多。不幸的是,由于各种原因,这些化合物未能转化为临床益处,并且随着公众对苯二氮䓬类药物的看法变差,该领域的研究兴趣逐渐减弱。然而,分子遗传学和药理学方法的出现已开始明确哪些GABA(A)受体亚型与非选择性苯二氮䓬类药物的各种药理作用相关。更具体地说,含有α2和/或α3的GABA(A)受体在焦虑中起作用,而α1亚型参与镇静作用,这增加了一种可能性,即一种选择性调节含有α2和/或α3的受体但不影响含有α1的受体的化合物将是一种无镇静作用的抗焦虑药。为了实现相对于α1对α2/α3亚型的选择性,可以采用两种方法;选择性亲和力或选择性内在活性。选择性亲和力依赖于一种化合物与α2/α3亚型结合的亲和力高于α1亚型,但迄今为止尚未描述过此类化合物。另一方面,亚型选择性内在活性依赖于一种化合物与所有亚型结合,但在不同亚型上具有不同的内在活性(相对选择性内在活性,例如SL654198或帕戈克隆),或者在某些亚型上有内在活性而在其他亚型上没有(绝对选择性内在活性;例如,L-838417)。将结合其作为治疗广泛性焦虑症的无镇静作用抗焦虑药的开发情况,对这些以及其他声称(但往往未明确说明)具有GABA(A)亚型选择性的BZ位点化合物(如ELB-139和奥西那普隆)的情况进行综述。