Jason Leonard A, Corradi Karina, Torres-Harding Susan, Taylor Renee R, King Caroline
DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois 60614, USA.
Neuropsychol Rev. 2005 Mar;15(1):29-58. doi: 10.1007/s11065-005-3588-2.
Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is an important condition confronting patients, clinicians, and researchers. This article provides information concerning the need for appropriate diagnosis of CFS subtypes. We first review findings suggesting that CFS is best conceptualized as a separate diagnostic entity rather than as part of a unitary model of functional somatic distress. Next, research involving the case definitions of CFS is reviewed. Findings suggest that whether a broad or more conservative case definition is employed, and whether clinic or community samples are recruited, these decisions will have a major influence in the types of patients selected. Review of further findings suggests that subtyping individuals with CFS on sociodemographic, functional disability, viral, immune, neuroendocrine, neurology, autonomic, and genetic biomarkers can provide clarification for researchers and clinicians who encounter CFS' characteristically confusing heterogeneous symptom profiles. Treatment studies that incorporate subtypes might be particularly helpful in better understanding the pathophysiology of CFS. This review suggests that there is a need for greater diagnostic clarity, and this might be accomplished by subgroups that integrate multiple variables including those in cognitive, emotional, and biological domains.
慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)是患者、临床医生和研究人员面临的一个重要病症。本文提供了有关对CFS亚型进行恰当诊断的必要性的信息。我们首先回顾一些研究结果,这些结果表明,CFS最好被概念化为一个单独的诊断实体,而不是作为功能性躯体不适单一模型的一部分。接下来,回顾了涉及CFS病例定义的研究。研究结果表明,无论采用宽泛的还是更保守的病例定义,也无论招募的是临床样本还是社区样本,这些决策都会对所选患者的类型产生重大影响。对进一步研究结果的回顾表明,根据社会人口统计学、功能残疾、病毒、免疫、神经内分泌、神经学、自主神经和遗传生物标志物对CFS患者进行亚型分类,可为遇到CFS典型的令人困惑的异质性症状特征的研究人员和临床医生提供清晰的认识。纳入亚型的治疗研究可能对更好地理解CFS的病理生理学特别有帮助。这篇综述表明需要更高的诊断清晰度,这可能通过整合包括认知、情感和生物学领域变量在内的多个变量的亚组来实现。