Calmels P, Béthoux F, Condemine A, Fayolle-Minon I
Unité PPEH-GIP E2S EA 3062, faculté de médecine Jacques-Lisfranc, université Jean-Monnet et service de médecine physique et de réadaptation, hôpital Bellevue, CHU de Saint-Etienne, 42055 Saint-Etienne cedex 02, France.
Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2005 Jul;48(6):288-97. doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2005.04.008. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
To identify and compare low back pain functional assessment tools and to determine their characteristics and the selection criteria for their use.
We systematically searched Medline with the key words: low back pain, scale validity, questionnaire, assessment, outcome, and functional evaluation and with some data from the "Guide des Outils de Mesure et d'Evaluation en Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation", which allowed us to complete the search on specific tools including the Roland Disability Questionnaire, Dallas Pain Questionnaire, Quebec Back Pain Questionnaire, and Oswestry Back Pain Questionnaire. We restricted our analysis to studies about the psychometric properties of functional tools.
We identified 19 scales or questionnaires, 9 specifically for low back pain and with a concept of functional incapacity. Four tools are recognised as having good psychometric properties and are widely used with linguistic adaptations in different countries. We also identified 10 generic tools proposed to assess outcome in low back pain, which are more conceptually linked to perceived health status, quality of life, and pain assessment.
A "gold standard" to evaluate disability in low back pain does not exist, but only 4 tools (the Dallas Pain Questionnaire, Roland Disability Questionnaire, Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire) demonstrated strong qualities (content and construct validity, feasibility, linguistic adaptation and international use).
识别并比较下腰痛功能评估工具,确定其特点及使用的选择标准。
我们使用关键词“下腰痛、量表效度、问卷、评估、结果、功能评估”对Medline进行系统检索,并参考了《物理医学与康复测量与评估工具指南》中的一些数据,这使我们能够完成对包括罗兰残疾问卷、达拉斯疼痛问卷、魁北克腰痛问卷和奥斯威斯瑞腰痛问卷在内的特定工具的检索。我们将分析局限于有关功能工具心理测量特性的研究。
我们识别出19种量表或问卷,其中9种专门针对下腰痛且具有功能丧失的概念。有4种工具被认为具有良好的心理测量特性,并在不同国家经过语言改编后被广泛使用。我们还识别出10种用于评估下腰痛结果的通用工具,它们在概念上与感知健康状况、生活质量和疼痛评估的联系更为紧密。
不存在评估下腰痛残疾的“金标准”,但只有4种工具(达拉斯疼痛问卷、罗兰残疾问卷、魁北克腰痛残疾量表和奥斯威斯瑞腰痛残疾问卷)展现出了较强的特性(内容和结构效度、可行性、语言改编和国际通用性)。