Niu Shu-Fen, Li I-Chuan
Nursing Department, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Jul;51(1):15-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03455.x.
This paper reports a study to compare the quality of life and its correlates for patients undergoing various types of renal replacement therapy.
Patients with end stage renal disease need renal replacement therapy as a substitute for their original kidneys. Different renal replacement therapies have different levels of impact on physical, psychological and social health. Quality of life as perceived by patients with end-stage renal disease is an important measure of patient outcome.
A cross-sectional, descriptive, correlational study was carried out in 2002. A total of 240 patients were recruited from two medical centres in northern Taiwan. These patients were currently undergoing one of following types of renal replacement therapies: haemodialysis, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis or transplantation. The study instrument used was the WHOQOL-BREF-TAIWAN. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
The scores for quality of life of transplantation patients were higher than those for both haemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. The lowest scores for all three groups were in the psychological domain. The mean age for haemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients was significantly higher than that for transplant patients. The educational level, proportion of single people, and employment status of transplant patients were significantly higher than those of haemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Perception of economic status as 'balanced' or 'proficient' for transplant patients was significantly higher than for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis patients.
Information about the quality of life of patients having various types of renal replacement therapy will assist physicians, nurses, patients and their families to make decisions on treatment selection. There is a need to establish support groups for patients having renal replacement therapy in order to enhance their quality of life, especially in the psychological domain.
本文报告一项研究,旨在比较接受不同类型肾脏替代治疗患者的生活质量及其相关因素。
终末期肾病患者需要肾脏替代治疗来替代其原有的肾脏。不同的肾脏替代治疗对身体、心理和社会健康有不同程度的影响。终末期肾病患者所感知的生活质量是衡量患者治疗结果的一项重要指标。
2002年开展了一项横断面、描述性、相关性研究。从台湾北部的两个医疗中心招募了共240名患者。这些患者目前正在接受以下类型的肾脏替代治疗之一:血液透析、持续性非卧床腹膜透析或肾移植。所使用的研究工具为台湾版世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL-BREF-TAIWAN)。数据采用描述性和推断性统计方法进行分析。
肾移植患者的生活质量得分高于血液透析和持续性非卧床腹膜透析患者。所有三组得分最低的均为心理领域。血液透析和持续性非卧床腹膜透析患者的平均年龄显著高于肾移植患者。肾移植患者的教育水平、单身比例和就业状况显著高于血液透析和持续性非卧床腹膜透析患者。肾移植患者对经济状况“平衡”或“良好”的认知显著高于持续性非卧床腹膜透析和血液透析患者。
有关接受不同类型肾脏替代治疗患者生活质量的信息将有助于医生、护士、患者及其家属做出治疗选择决策。有必要为接受肾脏替代治疗的患者建立支持小组,以提高他们的生活质量,尤其是在心理领域。