Melton Genevieve B, Somervell Helina, Friedman Kent P, Zeiger Martha A, Cahid Civelek A
Department of Surgery, Division of Endocrine Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nucl Med Commun. 2005 Jul;26(7):633-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mnm.0000168407.95508.dc.
Parathyroid gland localization and lateralization are important before surgery, particularly for minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) and recurrent hyperparathyroidism. We hypothesized that readings of Tc sestamibi scans with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) by a surgeon and nuclear medicine physician together (NMP+S) compared to a nuclear medicine physician alone (NMP alone) might affect scan interpretation accuracy.
Between May 1999 and December 2002, 127 hyperparathyroid patients had preoperative localization with sestamibi SPECT. Scans were prospectively interpreted by an endocrine surgeon and nuclear medicine physician attending together (NMP+S) and a nuclear medicine physician attending alone (NMP alone). These readings were compared to intra-operative findings, which served as the 'gold standard'.
There were 120 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (55 underwent MIP) and seven with secondary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism; seven patients had recurrent hyperparathyroidism. Of 127 patients, 83 had single adenomas; 27, double adenomas; 15, hyperplasia; one, MENIIA; and one, parathyroid cancer. Sensitivity and positive predictive values were 58.6% and 67.4% for NMP alone compared to 81.9% and 70.0% for NMP+S. The overall accuracy of correct localization was 45.7% vs. 60.6% (P<0.01) and of correct lateralization was 69.3% vs. 80.3% (P<0.01) for NMP alone versus NMP+S respectively. The most common finding interpreted incorrectly by NMP alone and correctly by NMP+S was an ectopic superior parathyroid adenoma in the inferior position. Ninety-eight per cent of patients were cured of their hyperparathyroidism.
Parathyroid sestamibi SPECT scan interpretation by an endocrine surgeon reading with a nuclear medicine attending resulted in improved accuracy of gland localization and lateralization compared to a nuclear medicine attending reading alone. This improvement may be due to increased awareness of clinical factors and head-and-neck anatomy.
甲状旁腺的定位和侧别判定在手术前很重要,特别是对于微创甲状旁腺切除术(MIP)和复发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症。我们推测,与仅由核医学医师解读相比,外科医生和核医学医师共同解读(NMP+S)锝 sestamibi 单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)结果可能会影响扫描解读的准确性。
1999 年 5 月至 2002 年 12 月期间,127 例甲状旁腺功能亢进患者术前接受了 sestamibi SPECT 定位检查。扫描结果由内分泌外科医生和核医学医师共同解读(NMP+S)以及仅由核医学医师解读(仅 NMP)。将这些解读结果与术中发现进行比较,术中发现作为“金标准”。
120 例患者为原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症(55 例接受了 MIP),7 例为继发性或三发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症;7 例患者为复发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症。127 例患者中,83 例有单个腺瘤;27 例有双腺瘤;15 例有增生;1 例为 MENIIA;1 例为甲状旁腺癌。仅 NMP 的敏感性和阳性预测值分别为 58.6%和 67.4%,而 NMP+S 分别为 81.9%和 70.0%。仅 NMP 与 NMP+S 相比,正确定位的总体准确率分别为 45.7%和 60.6%(P<0.01),正确侧别的准确率分别为 69.3%和 80.3%(P<0.01)。仅 NMP 解读错误而 NMP+S 解读正确的最常见发现是异位上甲状旁腺腺瘤位于下方位置。98%的患者甲状旁腺功能亢进症得到治愈。
与仅由核医学医师解读相比,内分泌外科医生与核医学医师共同解读甲状旁腺 sestamibi SPECT 扫描结果可提高腺体定位和侧别的准确性。这种提高可能是由于对临床因素和头颈部解剖结构的认识增加。