Davaki Konstantina, Mossialos Elias
LSE Health and Social Care,London School of Economics and Political Science.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2005 Feb-Apr;30(1-2):143-67. doi: 10.1215/03616878-30-1-2-143.
Changes in the health care sector in Greece since the pathbreaking introduction of the National Health System (NHS) in 1983 have been sluggish. Twenty years after its inception and a series of attempts to reform it, the NHS remains centralized, fragmented in terms of coverage, and quite far removed from its principles of equity and efficiency. Being part of an idiosyncratic welfare state, the health care system is bound to reflect the particularities of Greek society and economy, namely, clientelism, a weak formal-and a thriving informal-economy, the lack of a strong administrative class, a weak labor movement, and strong organized interests. As a result, several ambitious reform plans have failed repeatedly owing to an array of interrelated economic, political, and social factors that channel potential changes toward the trodden path. This constellation creates unfavorable conditions for the introduction and implementation of major reforms.
自1983年开创性地引入国家卫生系统(NHS)以来,希腊医疗保健部门的变革一直进展缓慢。在其成立二十年以及一系列改革尝试之后,国家卫生系统仍然高度集中,覆盖范围分散,并且与公平和效率原则相去甚远。作为一个特殊福利国家的一部分,医疗保健系统必然反映出希腊社会和经济的特殊性,即庇护主义、薄弱的正规经济和繁荣的非正规经济、缺乏强大的行政阶层、弱小的劳工运动以及强大的有组织利益集团。因此,由于一系列相互关联的经济、政治和社会因素,一些雄心勃勃的改革计划屡屡失败,这些因素将潜在的变革导向老路。这种情况为重大改革的引入和实施创造了不利条件。