Oliveira Mónica D, Magone José M, Pereira João A
LSE Health and Social Care, London School of Economics and Political Science.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2005 Feb-Apr;30(1-2):211-30. doi: 10.1215/03616878-30-1-2-211.
Despite there having been a positive context for initiating health care reforms in Portugal in the past fifteen years (accompanied by political consensus on the nature of the structural problems within the health care system), there has been a lack of reform initiatives. We use a process-based framework to show how institutional arrangements have influenced Portuguese health care reform. Evidence is presented to demonstrate inertia and nondecision making in three critical areas of Portuguese health policy: clarifying the public-private mix in coverage and provision, creating financial incentives and motivation for human resources, and introducing changes in the pharmaceutical market. Several factors seem to explain these processes, namely, problems in the balance of power within the political system, which have contributed to a lack of proper policy discussion; a lack of pluralism in the formation of health care policies (with low participation from citizens and high mobilization among structural interest groups); and the low priority of health care in public sector reforms. Portuguese politicians should be aware of the pitfalls of the current political system that constrain participatory arrangements and pluralism in policy making. In order to pursue health care reform, future governments will need to counterbalance the strong influence of structural interest groups.
尽管在过去十五年里葡萄牙具备启动医疗改革的积极背景(同时在医疗体系结构问题的性质上达成了政治共识),但改革举措却有所欠缺。我们运用一个基于过程的框架来展示制度安排是如何影响葡萄牙医疗改革的。文中给出的证据表明,在葡萄牙医疗政策的三个关键领域存在惰性和决策缺失:明确覆盖范围和服务提供中的公私混合情况、为人力资源创造财务激励和动力,以及在药品市场引入变革。有几个因素似乎可以解释这些过程,具体而言,政治体系内权力平衡存在问题,这导致缺乏适当的政策讨论;医疗政策形成过程中缺乏多元性(公民参与度低,结构性利益集团动员程度高);以及医疗在公共部门改革中的优先级较低。葡萄牙政治家应意识到当前政治体系中限制参与性安排和政策制定多元性的陷阱。为了推进医疗改革,未来政府需要制衡结构性利益集团的强大影响力。