Sullivan Lynn E, Chawarski Marek, O'Connor Patrick G, Schottenfeld Richard S, Fiellin David A
Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, P.O. Box 208025, New Haven, CT 06520-8025, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005 Jul;79(1):113-6. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.12.008.
Office-based buprenorphine holds the promise of bringing patients who have never received pharmacotherapy into treatment. In a cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis, we compared patients entering a clinical trial of buprenorphine in a Primary Care Clinic (PCC) and those entering a local Opioid Treatment Program (OTP) and we compared the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of PCC patients with no history of methadone treatment (new-to-treatment) to those with prior methadone treatment. PCC subjects (N=96) were enrolled in a 26-week randomized clinical trial of office-based buprenorphine/naloxone provided in a PCC. OTP subjects (N=94) were enrolled in methadone maintenance during the same time period. PCC subjects compared with OTP subjects were more likely to be male (77% versus 55%, p<0.01), full-time employed (46% versus 15%, p<0.001), have no history of methadone treatment (46% versus 61%, p<0.05), have fewer years of opioid dependence (10 versus 15, p<0.001), and lower rates of injection drug use (IDU) (44% versus 60%, p=0.03). The new-to-treatment PCC subjects were younger (36 years versus 41 years, p=0.001), more likely to be white (77% versus 57%, p=0.04), had fewer years of opioid dependence (7 versus 14, p<0.001), were less likely to have a history of IDU (35% versus 54%, p=0.07), and had lower rates of hepatitis C (25% versus 61%, p=0.002) than subjects with prior methadone treatment. Abstinence and treatment retention were comparable in both groups. The results suggest that office-based treatment of opioid dependence is associated with new types of patients entering into treatment. Treatment outcomes with buprenorphine in a PCC do not vary based on history of prior methadone treatment.
以办公室为基础的丁丙诺啡有望使从未接受过药物治疗的患者获得治疗。在一项横断面和纵向分析中,我们比较了进入初级保健诊所(PCC)丁丙诺啡临床试验的患者和进入当地阿片类药物治疗项目(OTP)的患者,并将无美沙酮治疗史(新接受治疗)的PCC患者与有美沙酮治疗史的患者的临床特征和治疗结果进行了比较。PCC受试者(N = 96)参加了一项在PCC中进行的为期26周的以办公室为基础的丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮随机临床试验。OTP受试者(N = 94)在同一时期参加了美沙酮维持治疗。与OTP受试者相比,PCC受试者更可能为男性(77%对55%,p<0.01)、全职工作(46%对15%,p<0.001)、无美沙酮治疗史(46%对61%,p<0.05)、阿片类药物依赖年限较少(10年对15年,p<0.001)以及注射吸毒(IDU)率较低(44%对60%,p = 0.03)。新接受治疗的PCC受试者比有美沙酮治疗史的受试者更年轻(36岁对41岁,p = 0.001)、更可能为白人(77%对57%,p = 0.04)、阿片类药物依赖年限较少(7年对14年,p<0.001)、有IDU史的可能性较小(35%对54%,p = 0.07)以及丙型肝炎发病率较低(25%对61%,p = 0.002)。两组的戒断率和治疗保留率相当。结果表明,以办公室为基础的阿片类药物依赖治疗与新类型的患者接受治疗有关。PCC中丁丙诺啡的治疗结果不会因既往美沙酮治疗史而有所不同。