Lo Yuan, Chia Yuan-Yi, Liu Kang, Ko Nai-Hua
Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan.
J Clin Anesth. 2005 Jun;17(4):271-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.08.010.
To determine if droperidol has a morphine-sparing effect when coadministered with morphine via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for postoperative pain management.
A randomized, double-blind clinical study.
Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.
One hundred seventy-nine American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 female patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.
At the end of surgery, patients in the droperidol group received PCA, with the device programmed to deliver a bolus dose of 1 mg morphine and 50 mug droperidol on demand. Patients in the control group received 1 mg morphine on demand. For both groups, PCA lockout was 5 minutes between boluses, with a 4-hour morphine limit of 30 mg.
Pain intensity at rest or on movement and relative sedation score were evaluated and recorded at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery. Related side effects were also evaluated and recorded on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3. Morphine use was significantly lower for the droperidol group than the control group during the postoperative 72-hour period (33.9 +/- 9.8 and 54.9 +/- 12.1 mg, respectively), with significantly decreased pain intensity levels for the former relative to the latter at 48 hours (pain intensity on movement: 3.9 +/- 1.2 vs 4.3 +/- 0.9, respectively; P = .049) and 72 hours (pain intensity on movement: 3.0 +/- 1.1 vs 3.6 +/- 0.5, respectively; P = .003; pain intensity at rest: 1.3 +/- 1.0 vs 1.6 +/- 0.7, respectively; P = .033) subsequent to surgery. Control subjects demonstrated a greater frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting than did their droperidol counterparts on postoperative day 1.
Coadministration of 50 mug droperidol and 1 mg morphine on demand via PCA provides a morphine-sparing effect and reduces the frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
确定在通过患者自控镇痛(PCA)用于术后疼痛管理时,将氟哌利多与吗啡联合使用是否具有吗啡节省效应。
一项随机、双盲临床研究。
台湾高雄荣民总医院麻醉科。
179例美国麻醉医师协会身体状况为1级和2级的接受腹部子宫切除术的女性患者。
手术结束时,氟哌利多组患者接受PCA,设备设定为按需给予1毫克吗啡和50微克氟哌利多的推注剂量。对照组患者按需接受1毫克吗啡。两组的PCA锁定时间均为推注之间5分钟,4小时吗啡限量为30毫克。
在术后6、12、24、48和72小时评估并记录静息或活动时的疼痛强度及相对镇静评分。还在术后第1、2和3天评估并记录相关副作用。术后72小时内,氟哌利多组的吗啡使用量显著低于对照组(分别为33.9±9.8毫克和54.9±12.1毫克),术后48小时(活动时疼痛强度:分别为3.9±1.2和4.3±0.9;P = 0.049)和72小时(活动时疼痛强度:分别为3.0±1.1和3.6±0.5;P = 0.003;静息时疼痛强度:分别为1.3±1.0和1.6±o.7;P = 0.033)时,氟哌利多组的疼痛强度水平相对于对照组显著降低。术后第1天,对照组患者术后恶心呕吐的发生率高于氟哌利多组。
通过PCA按需联合给予50微克氟哌利多和1毫克吗啡具有吗啡节省效应,并降低了术后恶心呕吐的发生率。